Expand the deslop phrase reference

SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
-name: unslop
-description: Remove AI writing patterns from prose using either audit-only detection or a two-pass rewrite flow (diagnosis then reconstruction). Use this skill when editing, reviewing, or rewriting AI-generated content to make it sound human. Triggers on requests to "humanize", "de-slop", "fix AI text", "make it sound human", "remove AI patterns", or when reviewing text that contains obvious AI tells like "Here's the thing:", "Let that sink in", or "In today's fast-paced landscape". Also use when the user pastes text and says it "sounds like ChatGPT", "sounds robotic", "needs to sound more natural", or asks you to "clean up" drafted content before publishing.
+name: deslop
+description: Improve prose that sounds AI-generated, vague, over-polished, or robotic. Use when asked to de-slop, humanise, make writing sound natural, remove AI tells, clean up a draft, flag cringe wording, audit prose before publishing, or replace filler and business jargon without changing the author's meaning.
 license: MIT
 user-invocable: true
 argument-hint: "[teach · cleanup · rewrite · mimic] [input]"
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ metadata:
   version: "2.3.0"
 ---
 
-# Unslop
+# Deslop
 
 Humanize AI-generated prose. Audit first. Rewrite only when the user asks for a rewrite.
 
@@ -19,10 +19,10 @@ presets supply optional voice, but neither can override the core contract.
 
 ## Routing
 
-**When the user invokes a sub-command (`/unslop teach ...`, `/unslop cleanup
+**When the user invokes a sub-command (`/deslop teach ...`, `/deslop cleanup
 ...`), you MUST read `references/commands/<command>.md` before acting.
 Non-optional — the command file defines the flow, and skipping it drops steps the
-user expects.** A bare `/unslop <text>` with no leading command word defaults to
+user expects.** A bare `/deslop <text>` with no leading command word defaults to
 `rewrite`. If the first word does not match a command but the intent clearly maps
 to one (e.g. "flag the AI tells, don't change anything" → `cleanup` report-only),
 load that command file and proceed as if invoked.

references/taboo-phrases.md

@@ -900,6 +900,37 @@ Single words that appear at disproportionately high rates in AI text.
 **Hard severity**: Always an AI tell regardless of context.
 **Soft severity**: Context-dependent — may be appropriate in academic or formal writing.
 
+### Abstract authority language
+
+These terms often let a draft sound weighty without saying what happened. They
+are **context-only**: keep them when they name a real technical, legal, or
+operational concept. Otherwise replace the abstraction with the concrete fact,
+rule, action, mechanism, or consequence.
+
+| Term | Reads as AI when | Better phrasing | Keep it when |
+|------|-----------------|----------------|--------------|
+| material | "a material improvement" gives no measure | name the measured change or concrete impact | it means legally, financially, or operationally significant under a defined threshold |
+| canonical | "the canonical approach" does not identify authority | name the source or chosen approach | it identifies the authoritative source, representation, or documented standard |
+| contract | "the contract is clear" hides the promise | state the API behaviour, agreement, or obligation | it means an API, legal, or published behavioural contract |
+| framework | "a robust framework" names no mechanism | name the process, controls, or decision rule | it names a defined method such as STRIDE or NIST CSF |
+| alignment | "drives alignment" hides the decision | state who agreed to what | it describes a documented agreement between named parties |
+| leverage | "leverage the platform" is business padding | use, apply, or depend on | it describes actual financial leverage |
+| robust | "a robust solution" gives no property | name the failure handling, coverage, or performance property | it is supported by explicit resilience criteria |
+| comprehensive | "a comprehensive review" does not state scope | list the systems, controls, or questions reviewed | it names an enumerated scope |
+| strategic | "a strategic priority" gives no objective | state the objective, decision, or trade-off | it distinguishes a documented long-term decision from routine work |
+
+### How to use this reference
+
+- **Hard-banned**: remove or replace in ordinary prose unless the surrounding
+  text falls under a stated exemption.
+- **Soft-banned**: flag for review. Keep it only if the sentence provides a
+  mechanism, definition, action, measure, or named source.
+- **Context-only**: do not treat the word as a tell by itself. Check whether it
+  names a real term of art or merely supplies borrowed authority.
+
+One questionable word is not proof that prose is AI-written. Look for repeated
+clusters, formulaic structures, vague claims, and a lack of concrete detail.
+
 ---
 
 ## Punctuation Abuse
@@ -1015,6 +1046,26 @@ Patterns added from external sources. Most academic single-words are `soft`
 
 **Sources:** Wikipedia [Signs of AI writing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing); Berens & Kobak, "Delving into ChatGPT usage in academic writing," *Science Advances* (2024), [llm-excess-vocab](https://github.com/berenslab/llm-excess-vocab); [hardikpandya/stop-slop](https://github.com/hardikpandya/stop-slop).
 
+### Vocabulary clusters and phrase patterns
+
+Online writing research identifies these as useful review signals when several
+appear together. They are normally **soft-banned**, not automatic findings.
+
+| Tell | Example to avoid | Plain replacement |
+|------|------------------|-------------------|
+| AI vocabulary cluster | "Additionally, this pivotal framework fosters a vibrant ecosystem." | State the next fact directly and name the mechanism. |
+| vague association | "The service is associated with identity management." | "The service validates user tokens." |
+| inflated copula | "The control serves as a cornerstone of security." | "The control blocks unauthorised deployment." |
+| false contrast | "This is not a feature, but a capability." | State the capability and its observable effect. |
+| manufactured importance | "It is important to note that the policy exists." | State the policy and what it requires. |
+| generic conclusion | "The future looks bright as the platform evolves." | State the next decision, risk, or measurable outcome. |
+| formulaic outlook | "Challenges remain, but future opportunities are promising." | Name the unresolved constraint and proposed action. |
+| chatbot affirmation | "Great question. I hope this helps." | Start with the answer; end when the answer is complete. |
+
+Common cluster members: `additionally`, `crucial`, `intricate`, `pivotal`,
+`testament`, `vibrant`, `landscape`, `interplay`, `underscore`, and `foster`.
+Use the existing category notes above before editing a legitimate technical use.
+
 ---
 
 ## Macro Structure