-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
Split Surjectivity #499
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
TOTBWF
wants to merge
15
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
split-surjectivity
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Split Surjectivity #499
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We should take the time to actually explain some of these equivalences at some point
Changed pages
|
plt-amy
reviewed
May 20, 2025
plt-amy
reviewed
May 20, 2025
plt-amy
reviewed
May 20, 2025
then the type of surjective splittings of a function $f : A \to B$ is equivalent to $A$. | ||
|
||
```agda | ||
cod-contr→surjective-splitting≃dom |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this name is a nightmare (i don't have anything better to offer at the moment).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Every day I stray closer to the light of Lemma 1.2.4.12
plt-amy
reviewed
May 20, 2025
plt-amy
reviewed
May 20, 2025
Suggested-by: Amélia <[email protected]>
ncfavier
reviewed
May 20, 2025
Suggested-by: Naïm Camille Favier <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Naïm Camille Favier <[email protected]>
ncfavier
reviewed
May 20, 2025
ncfavier
reviewed
May 20, 2025
Suggested-by: Naïm Camille Favier <[email protected]>
ncfavier
approved these changes
May 20, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Pulling some of my changes out of #375 in hopes of getting back to it at some point. This PR defines split surjectivity, and also proves some misc. lemmas about surjective maps. I've done some minor cleanup in some of the base modules, and added some (hopefully useful!) equivalences.
Checklist
Before submitting a merge request, please check the items below:
support/sort-imports.hs
(ornix run --experimental-features nix-command -f . sort-imports
).If your change affects many files without adding substantial content, and
you don't want your name to appear on those pages (for example, treewide
refactorings or reformattings), start the commit message and PR title with
chore:
.