Skip to content

fix: Non-letter payment method identifiers are accepted - #379

Open
mpp-agricola[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
agricola/agr-2026-023
Open

fix: Non-letter payment method identifiers are accepted#379
mpp-agricola[bot] wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
agricola/agr-2026-023

Conversation

@mpp-agricola

@mpp-agricola mpp-agricola Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

Agricola found that tempoxyz/mpp-rs diverges from the canonical implementation: fix: Non-letter payment method identifiers are accepted

The Agricola ticket #98 contains the audit evidence, affected SDKs, and remediation lifecycle.

Summary

  • Reconciles semantic:challenge-parsing/enforce-method-identifier-grammar in the target SDK's idioms.
  • Adds implementation and regression coverage for AGR-2026-023.
  • Links the change to the Agricola ticket #98.

Key design considerations

  • Limits scope to the audited delta between wevm/mppx@b7ab48e38e3d and tempoxyz/mpp-rs@9808dede7ad8.
  • Favors the target SDK's public API and conventions over a literal port.
  • Uses the stable agricola/agr-2026-023 automation branch.
  • Remains a draft until a maintainer reviews the generated changes.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Changelog found on PR.

Edit changelog

@brendanjryan
brendanjryan marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2026 03:42

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f82688c344

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/client/fetch.rs
Comment thread src/protocol/core/headers.rs Outdated
Comment thread src/client/fetch.rs Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant