Skip to content

🌱 Allow reattach on node with different name. #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

guettli
Copy link

@guettli guettli commented Apr 22, 2024

Changed Go code and values.yaml, so that the code runs in a wl-cluster (baremetal on hetzner).

This .envrc is needed:

❯ cat .envrc 
export KUBECONFIG=$HOME/syself/cluster-stacks/wl.kubeconfig
export PUSH=true
export IMAGE_PREFIX=ghcr.io/syself/csi-

Install with:

helm install --namespace=topolvm-system topolvm charts/topolvm

You can upload a new image with make multi-platform-image-normal

@guettli guettli requested a review from janiskemper April 24, 2024 22:09
@@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ lvmd:

# lvmd.nodeSelector -- Specify nodeSelector.
## ref: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/
nodeSelector: {}
nodeSelector:
instance.hetzner.cloud/is-root-server: "true"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i guess you can remove this?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@batistein I don't think this can be removed. Up to now we don't have a way to specifiy nodes which have storage.

@@ -287,7 +288,8 @@ node:

# node.nodeSelector -- Specify nodeSelector.
## ref: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/
nodeSelector: {}
nodeSelector:
instance.hetzner.cloud/is-root-server: "true"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove?

@guettli guettli force-pushed the tg/allow-reattach-on-node-with-different-name branch from df1205a to d767320 Compare April 25, 2024 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants