Skip to content

fix: worker_threads issue on glibc platform #10306

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

@Brooooooklyn Brooooooklyn requested a review from a team as a code owner April 2, 2025 09:26
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9adb46e

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Member

@kdy1 kdy1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@kdy1 kdy1 added this to the Planned milestone Apr 2, 2025
@kdy1 kdy1 merged commit 1d1ff9e into main Apr 2, 2025
163 checks passed
@kdy1 kdy1 deleted the 04-02-fix_worker_threads_issue_on_glibc_platform branch April 2, 2025 09:44
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Apr 2, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #10306 will degrade performances by 1.04%

Comparing 04-02-fix_worker_threads_issue_on_glibc_platform (9adb46e) with main (a80dea8)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvements
❌ 1 regressions
✅ 150 untouched benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
serialization of serde 2.8 µs 2.8 µs -1.04%
es/lints/libs/d3 28.2 ms 27.9 ms +1.03%

@kdy1 kdy1 modified the milestones: Planned, v1.11.17 Apr 4, 2025
@swc-project swc-project locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants