Skip to content

Adding imageType to infraEnv#4184

Closed
liatb-rh wants to merge 1 commit intostolostron:mainfrom
liatb-rh:Mgmt-18987-adding-iso-type-minimal+full
Closed

Adding imageType to infraEnv#4184
liatb-rh wants to merge 1 commit intostolostron:mainfrom
liatb-rh:Mgmt-18987-adding-iso-type-minimal+full

Conversation

@liatb-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@liatb-rh liatb-rh commented Jan 8, 2025

Adding the ability to choose between download of minimal or full ISO

  • Translation is updated
  • Discovery form elements where re organized
  • Modal host is now handling imageType
  • Discovery group control layout is updated with Flex element instead of Stack

Screenshot 2024-12-16 at 12 20 42

Screenshot 2024-12-19 at 17 08 27

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at it, you'll need to add a 'DCO signoff' to your commits.

📝 Please follow instructions in the contributing guide to update your commits with the DCO

Full details of the Developer Certificate of Origin can be found at developercertificate.org.

The list of commits missing DCO signoff:

  • 6f84f64 Adding imageType to infraEnv
Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liatb-rh
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign fxiang1 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Hi @liatb-rh. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a stolostron member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@KevinFCormier
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Jan 8, 2025

@liatb-rh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/check 6f84f64 link true /test check

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jan 8, 2025

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@liatb-rh liatb-rh closed this by deleting the head repository Jul 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants