This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 24, 2022. It is now read-only.
Web workers support #971
Closed
Web workers support #971
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'll send updated version in few days. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is basic implementation of WebWorker environment support based on #656.
Also there JSIL.js was changed a little bit for better compatibility with JS packers (tested with browserify). When it pack files, each file is placed inside function which is called on newly created object. After it, resolving of global scope through this doesn't work anymore. However, in both browser and webworker global scope could be accessed with
selfproperty. So, if self is defined, it is used as global scope reference.