Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jna monorepo to v5.16.0 #1157

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

slack-oss-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform dependencies minor 5.15.0 -> 5.16.0
net.java.dev.jna:jna dependencies minor 5.15.0 -> 5.16.0

Release Notes

java-native-access/jna (net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform)

v5.16.0

Compare Source

==============

Features

  • #​1626: Add caching of field list and field validation in Structure along with more efficient reentrant read-write locking instead of synchronized() blocks - @​BrettWooldridge

Bug Fixes


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot force-pushed the test-renovate/jna-monorepo branch 4 times, most recently from 93e6896 to adf094d Compare December 27, 2024 08:06
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot force-pushed the test-renovate/jna-monorepo branch from adf094d to 9568995 Compare December 28, 2024 08:06
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot merged commit e6fd1f0 into main Dec 29, 2024
4 checks passed
@slack-oss-bot slack-oss-bot deleted the test-renovate/jna-monorepo branch December 29, 2024 08:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant