Skip to content

Feature/remove get available tags#467

Closed
Shashankss1205 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/remove_get_available_tags
Closed

Feature/remove get available tags#467
Shashankss1205 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
feature/remove_get_available_tags

Conversation

@Shashankss1205

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Reference Issues/PRs

See also: feature/data_management

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This PR cleans up legacy, unused docstring comments referencing the get_available_tags tool in list_estimators.py.
The get_available_tags tool was previously unified and integrated into the query_registry tool under target="tags". Removing these legacy docstrings prevents developer and LLM confusion when interacting with the discovery tool catalog.

Does your contribution introduce a new dependency? If yes, which one?

No, this contribution does not introduce any new dependencies.

What should a reviewer concentrate their feedback on?

  • Verify that all unit tests (make check) continue to pass.
  • Verify that query_registry(target="tags") remains the unified interface for tag queries.

Any other comments?

N/A

PR checklist

For all contributions
  • I've added unit tests and made sure they pass locally (make check).
  • I've added the tool to the online documentation in docs/source/.
  • I've updated the existing example scripts or provided a new one to showcase how my tool works in examples/.

@Shashankss1205 Shashankss1205 self-assigned this Jun 4, 2026
@Shashankss1205 Shashankss1205 force-pushed the feature/remove_get_available_tags branch from f08cd15 to ea4fe5b Compare June 4, 2026 19:49
@Shashankss1205 Shashankss1205 force-pushed the feature/remove_get_available_tags branch from ea4fe5b to 7704998 Compare June 4, 2026 19:58

@Shashankss1205 Shashankss1205 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Stale

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants