Skip to content

fix typos #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
nikai3d wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix typos #1

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions doc/20130806_DiHiggsToBBGG/note.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ \section{Object Selection and Performance}
Jets are reconstructed using the anti-Kt algorithm with the $D$ parameter equal to $0.5$,
and corrected for pileup effects using the FastJet technique \cite{CMS:2010xta,CMS-DP-2013-011}. Standard CMS
jet energy corrections are applied up to level 3, correcting for non-uniformities as a function of
pseudorapditiy and $p_{T}$. Jets are tagged as originating from a b-quark by searching for the
pseudorapidity and $p_{T}$. Jets are tagged as originating from a b-quark by searching for the
presence of secondary vertices. Lifetime information from tracks are also combined to form a
combined secondary vertex b-tagging discriminator (CSV)~\cite{CMS:BTagPaper,CMS-DP-2013-005}.
The medium working point for the CSV tagger is used. The efficiency for tagging b-jets is
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ \section{Object Selection and Performance}

Electrons and Muons are selected for the purpose of vetoing events with signatures consistent
with Higgs produced in association with a top and anti top quark pair. This process contributes
significantly to the total background after signal event selection requirements. A non-negligble
significantly to the total background after signal event selection requirements. A non-negligible
fraction of such background events contain leptons and can be rejected on this basis. Very loose
selection requirements, denoted as the veto working point, are placed on the
electron and muon candidates in order to suppress this background as much as possible.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ \section{Event Selection and Optimization}
\includegraphics[scale=0.35, angle=0]{figures/SumbbggPt_ps_normalized.pdf}
\includegraphics[scale=0.35, angle=0]{figures/dibjetPt_ps_normalized.pdf}
\includegraphics[scale=0.35, angle=0]{figures/diphotonPt_ps_normalized.pdf}
\caption{photon and b-jet $p_{T}$ distributioons post-object selection}
\caption{photon and b-jet $p_{T}$ distributions post-object selection}
\label{fig:Ptcuts}
\end{figure}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ \subsubsection{Two Dimensional Fits}


\section{Upgrade Scenarios}
\label{sec:scnearios}
\label{sec:scenarios}

Rather than providing estimates of systematic uncertainties with limited accuracy, we instead
provide di-Higgs cross section measurement uncertainties under a number of different scenarios
Expand Down