Properly preserve specified markers (matching fix in machine)

[Enkidu93]

Fixes #166

---

This change is 

[Enkidu93]

This was the 'small fix' I mentioned in Tuesday's meeting that might be the only inconsistency between Serval & silnlp.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.55%. Comparing base (7cea3f5) to head (c7a6ca1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #167      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.53%   88.55%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         276      276              
  Lines       16489    16498       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        14599    14609      +10     
+ Misses       1890     1889       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ddaspit]

Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @isaac091 and @johnml1135)

[isaac091]

Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @johnml1135)

[Enkidu93]

@isaac091 Should I go ahead and release a new machine library version & then you can update the dependency in silnlp? Or what needs to be done to get this change integrated into silnlp?

[isaac091]

Yeah, that would be great! I'm already making another round of updates to what will be the affected code anyway.

[Enkidu93]

Yeah, that would be great! I'm already making another round of updates to what will be the affected code anyway.

Should be released now, @isaac091. Thank you!