Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove CI Rails versions #172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025
Merged

Remove CI Rails versions #172

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2025

Conversation

MUTOgen
Copy link
Contributor

@MUTOgen MUTOgen commented Feb 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Streamlined internal testing workflows by consolidating redundant test configurations, ensuring a more efficient and reliable process behind the scenes.

@MUTOgen MUTOgen self-assigned this Feb 9, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request simplifies the GitHub Actions workflow by removing the job definitions for rails_4_2 and rails_5_2 in the .github/workflows/ruby.yml file. Only the rails_3_2 job remains active, which sets up Ruby version 2.3 and runs tests via Rake. This change reduces complexity by eliminating duplicate testing scenarios for different Ruby versions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ruby.yml Removed jobs for rails_4_2 and rails_5_2; retained rails_3_2 job that sets up Ruby 2.3 and runs tests via Rake.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant G as GitHub Actions
    participant J as rails_3_2 Job
    participant R as Ruby Environment

    G->>J: Trigger workflow event
    J->>R: Set up Ruby (version 2.3)
    R-->>J: Environment ready
    J->>G: Execute tests via Rake
    G-->>J: Report test results
Loading

Poem

Hop, hop, in the code burrow we play,
Rails jobs left—two hopped away!
Only rails_3_2 hops in to prove,
Ruby 2.3's groove in every move.
A cleaner workflow, a gentle cheer,
CodeRabbit hops with joy so clear! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd83125 and 2357a42.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ruby.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ruby.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: rails_3_2

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MUTOgen MUTOgen requested a review from grantspeelman February 9, 2025 14:47
@MUTOgen
Copy link
Contributor Author

MUTOgen commented Feb 9, 2025

@grantspeelman We could start from here. Remove all versions except 3.2 (some of them fail on master sometimes)
Then merge #170 to change 3.2 -> 6.1, and so on

@grantspeelman
Copy link
Collaborator

@grantspeelman We could start from here. Remove all versions except 3.2 (some of them fail on master sometimes) Then merge #170 to change 3.2 -> 6.1, and so on

I haved removed all of them. Will add them back once everything is merged.

@MUTOgen MUTOgen merged commit eb57361 into master Feb 9, 2025
2 checks passed
@MUTOgen MUTOgen deleted the cleanup-ci-rails-versions branch February 9, 2025 23:00
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants