Skip to content

Conversation

bwerth
Copy link

@bwerth bwerth commented Mar 10, 2016

This change is Reviewable

@rdiverdi
Copy link

Review status: 0 of 6 files reviewed at latest revision, 9 unresolved discussions.


mp4_music21_rev1.py, line 1 [r7] (raw file):
Header Comment :(
who are you, what are you doing?


mp4_music21_rev1.py, line 30 [r7] (raw file):
this would be shorter if it were just:

if dierection == "decending":
    result = result.reverse()
return result

mp4_music21_rev1.py, line 52 [r7] (raw file):
repetition


mp4_music21_rev1.py, line 54 [r7] (raw file):
There is a lot of code here in the main body of the file. You should have most of this in functions with just a few function calls at the end


mp4_music_generation_rev2.py, line 1 [r7] (raw file):
ooo, a header comment

You should remove old versions of code from your github repository before submitting


mp4_music_generation_rev2.py, line 18 [r7] (raw file):
This isn't a good place to define a thing, it should be in init as self.note_list (maybe)


README, line 1 [r7] (raw file):
Good use of readme, look into markdown for future readmes - Github is set up to work with them very nicely, and they give you lots of nice formatting opitons


README, line 4 [r7] (raw file):
links are always useful


README, line 6 [r7] (raw file):
that's not not the direction slashes go
Also, this should probably instruct me to clone your repository in my home directory


Comments from the review on Reviewable.io

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants