forked from delta-io/delta
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
delete #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
scottsand-db
wants to merge
1
commit into
diff_tests_00
Choose a base branch
from
diff_tests_01
base: diff_tests_00
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
delete #2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
scottsand-db
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
…rClient` API (delta-io#3797) This is a stacked PR. Please view this PR's diff here: - delta_kernel_cc_1...delta_kernel_cc_2 #### Which Delta project/connector is this regarding? - [ ] Spark - [ ] Standalone - [ ] Flink - [X] Kernel - [ ] Other (fill in here) ## Description Adds new `TableDescriptor` and `CommitCoordinatorClient` API. Adds a new `getCommitCoordinatorClient` API to the `Engine` (with a default implementation that throws an exception). ## How was this patch tested? N/A trivial. ## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing changes? Yes. See the above.
scottsand-db
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
…ordinatorClient` API (delta-io#3797)" This reverts commit 6ae4b62.
scottsand-db
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2024
…inatorClient API" (delta-io#3917) This reverts commit 6ae4b62 We seem to be rethinking our Coordinated Commits CUJ / APIs, and we don't want these APIs leaked in Delta 3.3.
scottsand-db
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2025
…ColumnMapping (delta-io#4319) <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you: 1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://github.com/delta-io/delta/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md 2. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP] Your PR title ...'. 3. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes. 4. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes. 5. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review. 6. If applicable, include the corresponding issue number in the PR title and link it in the body. --> #### Which Delta project/connector is this regarding? <!-- Please add the component selected below to the beginning of the pull request title For example: [Spark] Title of my pull request --> - [ ] Spark - [ ] Standalone - [ ] Flink - [x] Kernel - [ ] Other (fill in here) ## Description <!-- - Describe what this PR changes. - Describe why we need the change. If this PR resolves an issue be sure to include "Resolves #XXX" to correctly link and close the issue upon merge. --> Split the main PR delta-io#4265 for faster review Add a util func `convertToPhysicalColumnNames` in ColumnMapping to get the corresponding physical column name for a logical column ## How was this patch tested? <!-- If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to test the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible. If the changes were tested in any way other than unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step (ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future). If the changes were not tested, please explain why. --> Add unit test cases in ColumnMappingSuite.scala ## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing changes? <!-- If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible. If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Delta Lake versions or within the unreleased branches such as master. If no, write 'No'. -->
scottsand-db
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
…sage with replace table (delta-io#4520) <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you: 1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://github.com/delta-io/delta/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md 2. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP] Your PR title ...'. 3. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes. 4. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes. 5. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review. 6. If applicable, include the corresponding issue number in the PR title and link it in the body. --> #### Which Delta project/connector is this regarding? <!-- Please add the component selected below to the beginning of the pull request title For example: [Spark] Title of my pull request --> - [ ] Spark - [ ] Standalone - [ ] Flink - [X] Kernel - [ ] Other (fill in here) ## Description Update SchemaUtils and ColumnMapping with unit tests in order to support REPLACE TABLE with column mapping + fieldId re-use in PR #2. Specifically this involves the following changes (not necessarily related, but combined in this PR) 1) When a connector provides its own column mapping info in the schema pre-populated we require that it's complete (i.e. fieldId AND physicalName must be present) 2) We add an argument to our schema validation checks `allowNewNonNullableFields`. This is useful in cases where we can be sure the table state has been completely cleared, and thus new non-null fields are valid (like REPLACE). 3) We don't allow adding a new column with a fieldId less than the maxColId. For now, do this proactively for safety. In the future in the case of something like RESTORE in the future we will likely need a config to bypass this check. ## How was this patch tested? Updates unit tests. Also, all the changes in this PR are used by delta-io#4520 which adds a lot more E2E tests with multiple schema scenarios. ## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing changes? No.
scottsand-db
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2025
…elta-io#4732) <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you: 1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://github.com/delta-io/delta/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md 2. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP] Your PR title ...'. 3. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes. 4. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes. 5. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review. 6. If applicable, include the corresponding issue number in the PR title and link it in the body. --> #### Which Delta project/connector is this regarding? <!-- Please add the component selected below to the beginning of the pull request title For example: [Spark] Title of my pull request --> - [ ] Spark - [ ] Standalone - [ ] Flink - [x] Kernel - [ ] Other (fill in here) ## Description <!-- - Describe what this PR changes. - Describe why we need the change. If this PR resolves an issue be sure to include "Resolves #XXX" to correctly link and close the issue upon merge. --> This PR is refactoring only, move all the IcebergCompatChecks from `IcebergCompatV2MetadataValidatorAndUpdater.java` to its base class `IcebergCompatMetadataValidatorAndUpdater.java` so that later newly added `IcebergCompatV3MetadataValidatorAndUpdater.java` can use them. ## How was this patch tested? <!-- If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to test the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible. If the changes were tested in any way other than unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step (ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future). If the changes were not tested, please explain why. --> Existing unit tests since it is only doing refactoring. ## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing changes? <!-- If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible. If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Delta Lake versions or within the unreleased branches such as master. If no, write 'No'. -->
scottsand-db
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2025
…lta-io#4734) <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you: 1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://github.com/delta-io/delta/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md 2. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP] Your PR title ...'. 3. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes. 4. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes. 5. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review. 6. If applicable, include the corresponding issue number in the PR title and link it in the body. --> #### Which Delta project/connector is this regarding? <!-- Please add the component selected below to the beginning of the pull request title For example: [Spark] Title of my pull request --> - [ ] Spark - [ ] Standalone - [ ] Flink - [x] Kernel - [ ] Other (fill in here) ## Description <!-- - Describe what this PR changes. - Describe why we need the change. If this PR resolves an issue be sure to include "Resolves #XXX" to correctly link and close the issue upon merge. --> This PR is refactoring only, move all the validation checks from `IcebergWriterCompatV1MetadataValidatorAndUpdater.java` to a new base class `IcebergWriterCompatMetadataValidatorAndUpdater.java` so that later newly added `IcebergWriterCompatV3MetadataValidatorAndUpdater.java` can use them. ## How was this patch tested? <!-- If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to test the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible. If the changes were tested in any way other than unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step (ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future). If the changes were not tested, please explain why. --> Existing unit tests since it is only doing refactoring. ## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing changes? <!-- If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible. If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Delta Lake versions or within the unreleased branches such as master. If no, write 'No'. -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.