-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
scmp: export SCMP to controlplane draft #87
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (I fixed a couple of minor things)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this section go to the CP?
## Link Failure Notification - SCMP {#link-down-notification} | ||
|
||
In SCION, an intermediate router cannot change the path followed by a packet, only the source endpoint can chose a different path. Therefore, to enable fast recovery, a router SHOULD signal forwarding failures to the source, via a [SCMP notification](#scmp-notification). This allows the source endpoint to quickly switch to a different path. | ||
In SCION, an intermediate router cannot change the path followed by a packet, only the source endpoint can chose a different path. Therefore, to enable fast recovery, a router SHOULD signal forwarding failures to the source, via a SCMP notification (see {{I-D.dekater-scion-controlplane}} section "SCMP/Error Messages"). This allows the source endpoint to quickly switch to a different path. | ||
|
||
Sending an SCMP error notification is OPTIONAL. Endpoints should therefore implement additional mechanisms to validate or detect link down signals. To reduce exposure to denial-of-service attacks, SCION routers SHOULD employ rate limiting when sending recommended SCMP notifications (especially identical ones). Rate limit policies are up to each AS' administrator. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this section go to the CP?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so. Just because the control plane provides the SCMP service (by some definition of provides, anyway), doesn't mean that everything that makes use of it becomes part of the control service, does it?
As you seem to let me make that choice, I'm merging.
Also, in passing:
Resolves: #84
Resolves: #86