Improve the "Backwards compatible case classes" guide with Scala 2 and 3 specifics

_overviews/tutorials/binary-compatibility-for-library-authors.md

@@ -178,11 +178,12 @@ Again, we recommend using MiMa to double-check that you have not broken binary c
 Sometimes, it is desirable to change the definition of a case class (adding and/or removing fields) while still staying backwards-compatible with the existing usage of the case class, i.e. not breaking the so-called _binary compatibility_. The first question you should ask yourself is “do you need a _case_ class?” (as opposed to a regular class, which can be easier to evolve in a binary compatible way). A good reason for using a case class is when you need a structural implementation of `equals` and `hashCode`.
 
 To achieve that, follow this pattern:
- * make the primary constructor private (this makes the `copy` method of the class private as well)
- * define a private `unapply` function in the companion object (note that by doing that the case class loses the ability to be used as an extractor in match expressions)
+ * make the primary constructor private (for Scala 3, this makes the `copy` method of the class and `apply` in the companion object private as well, for Scala 2 you get this behavior using `-Xsource:3`)
  * for all the fields, define `withXXX` methods on the case class that create a new instance with the respective field changed (you can use the private `copy` method to implement them)
  * create a public constructor by defining an `apply` method in the companion object (it can use the private constructor)
- * in Scala 2, you have to add the compiler option `-Xsource:3`
+ * (Scala 2) you have to add the compiler option `-Xsource:3`
+ * (Scala 2) define a private `unapply` method in the companion object (note that by doing that the case class loses the ability to be used as an extractor in match expressions)
+ * (Scala 3) define a custom `fromProduct` method in the companion object
 
 Example:
 
@@ -216,8 +217,13 @@ case class Person private (name: String, age: Int):
 object Person:
   // Create a public constructor (which uses the private primary constructor)
   def apply(name: String, age: Int): Person = new Person(name, age)
-  // Make the extractor private
-  private def unapply(p: Person) = p
+  // Implement a custom `fromProduct`
+  def fromProduct(p: Product): Person = p.productArity match
+    case 2 =>
+      Person(
+        p.productElement(0).asInstanceOf[String],
+        p.productElement(1).asInstanceOf[Int],
+      )
 ```
 {% endtab %}
 {% endtabs %}
@@ -254,20 +260,24 @@ alice match
 
 Later in time, you can amend the original case class definition to, say, add an optional `address` field. You
  * add a new field `address` and a custom `withAddress` method,
- * update the public `apply` method in the companion object to initialize all the fields,
+ * add a new `apply` method to the companion object to initialize all the fields and adjust the old `apply`,
  * tell MiMa to [ignore](https://github.com/lightbend/mima#filtering-binary-incompatibilities) changes to the class constructor. This step is necessary because MiMa does not yet ignore changes in private class constructor signatures (see [#738](https://github.com/lightbend/mima/issues/738)).
+ * (Scala 3) add a new case to the `fromProduct` method in the companion object
 
 {% tabs case_class_compat_4 class=tabs-scala-version %}
 {% tab 'Scala 2' %}
 ~~~ scala
 case class Person private (name: String, age: Int, address: Option[String]) {
   ...
+  // Add the `withXxx` method
   def withAddress(address: Option[String]) = copy(address = address)
 }
 
 object Person {
   // Update the public constructor to also initialize the address field
   def apply(name: String, age: Int): Person = new Person(name, age, None)
+  // Add a new `apply` with the address field
+  def apply(name: String, age: Int, address: Option[String]): Person = new Person(name, age, address)
 }
 ~~~
 {% endtab %}
@@ -280,6 +290,21 @@ case class Person private (name: String, age: Int, address: Option[String]):
 object Person:
   // Update the public constructor to also initialize the address field
   def apply(name: String, age: Int): Person = new Person(name, age, None)
+  // Add a new `apply` with the address field
+  def apply(name: String, age: Int, address: Option[String]): Person = new Person(name, age, address)
+  // Add a new case to `fromProduct`
+  def fromProduct(p: Product): Person = p.productArity match
+    case 2 =>
+      Person(
+        p.productElement(0).asInstanceOf[String],
+        p.productElement(1).asInstanceOf[Int],
+      )
+    case 3 =>
+      Person(
+        p.productElement(0).asInstanceOf[String],
+        p.productElement(1).asInstanceOf[Int],
+        p.productElement(2).asInstanceOf[Option[String]],
+      )
 ```
 {% endtab %}
 {% endtabs %}