Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.31.0 #8540

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 7, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@portabletext/editor (source) ^1.30.6 -> ^1.31.0 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled because a matching PR was automerged previously.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2025 11:51
@renovate renovate bot requested review from ryanbonial and removed request for a team February 7, 2025 11:51
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2025 0:00am
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 7, 2025 0:00am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 7, 2025 0:00am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 7, 2025 0:00am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 7, 2025 0:00am

@stipsan stipsan enabled auto-merge February 7, 2025 11:58
@stipsan stipsan added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit 1ffa00a Feb 7, 2025
39 of 41 checks passed
@stipsan stipsan deleted the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch February 7, 2025 11:59
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 7, 2025 12:14 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 19s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 51s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 27s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 7s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 30s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 3s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 13s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 44s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.45% 53812 / 126761
🔵 Statements 42.45% 53812 / 126761
🔵 Functions 47.94% 2772 / 5782
🔵 Branches 78.74% 10292 / 13070
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #29998 for commit c9cfd9e by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:17:13 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 23.5 efps (43ms) 22.2 efps (45ms) +3ms (+5.9%)
article (body) 63.1 efps (16ms) 63.1 efps (16ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 25.0 efps (40ms) 25.6 efps (39ms) -1ms (-2.5%)
article (string inside array) 22.2 efps (45ms) 22.5 efps (45ms) -1ms (-1.1%)
recipe (name) 50.0 efps (20ms) 62.5 efps (16ms) -4ms (-20.0%)
recipe (description) 55.6 efps (18ms) 71.4 efps (14ms) -4ms (-22.2%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 20.8 efps (48ms) 18.9 efps (53ms) +5ms (+10.4%)
synthetic (string inside object) 19.6 efps (51ms) 19.0 efps (53ms) +2ms (+2.9%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 43ms 47ms 72ms 438ms 880ms 12.6s
article (body) 16ms 19ms 53ms 102ms 219ms 6.1s
article (string inside object) 40ms 43ms 47ms 169ms 135ms 7.3s
article (string inside array) 45ms 47ms 49ms 65ms 208ms 7.0s
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 25ms 43ms 0ms 7.1s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 20ms 42ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 7ms 12ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 48ms 50ms 53ms 105ms 99ms 12.9s
synthetic (string inside object) 51ms 54ms 67ms 282ms 1374ms 8.9s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 45ms 76ms 87ms 558ms 1166ms 12.5s
article (body) 16ms 19ms 32ms 314ms 581ms 6.5s
article (string inside object) 39ms 40ms 43ms 180ms 142ms 6.7s
article (string inside array) 45ms 47ms 51ms 268ms 327ms 7.4s
recipe (name) 16ms 17ms 22ms 34ms 0ms 6.2s
recipe (description) 14ms 15ms 17ms 27ms 0ms 3.9s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 7ms 15ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 53ms 56ms 64ms 314ms 1021ms 12.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 53ms 54ms 88ms 134ms 1207ms 8.6s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

juice49 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant