fix(deps): upgrade `vite` to v6 #7995

rexxars · 2024-12-09T19:34:00Z

Description

Upgrades vite to the latest version (v6), as well as vitest to v3

What to review

Give it a test, see how it feels! Does anything break?
There's a prerelease you can use to test it on a local studio, under the upgrade-vite-v6 branch on npm.

Testing

Commands involved:

sanity dev
sanity build
sanity preview

Notes for release

Upgrades vite to version 6

vercel · 2024-12-09T19:34:04Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 16, 2025 5:21pm
performance-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 16, 2025 5:21pm
test-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 16, 2025 5:21pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Jan 16, 2025 5:21pm
test-next-studio	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Jan 16, 2025 5:21pm

socket-security · 2024-12-09T19:34:36Z

New, updated, and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/@babel/generator@7.26.3	None	`+3`	2.69 MB	nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/traverse@7.26.4	Transitive: environment	`+3`	2.67 MB	nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@babel/types@7.26.3	environment	`0`	2.55 MB	nicolo-ribaudo
npm/@codemirror/commands@6.7.1 🔁 npm/@codemirror/commands@6.8.0	None	`+1`	472 kB	marijn
npm/@codemirror/language@6.10.7 🔁 npm/@codemirror/language@6.10.8	Transitive: environment	`+3`	735 kB	adrianheine, marijn
npm/@codemirror/state@6.5.0 🔁 npm/@codemirror/state@6.5.1	None	`+1`	444 kB	marijn
npm/@codemirror/view@6.36.0 🔁 npm/@codemirror/view@6.36.2	None	`+2`	1.19 MB	adrianheine, marijn
npm/@sanity/color-input@4.0.1 🔁 npm/@sanity/color-input@4.0.3	Transitive: environment, eval	`+8`	8.35 MB	sanity-io
npm/@sanity/diff-match-patch@3.1.1	None	`0`	533 kB	sanity-io
npm/styled-components@6.1.13	environment Transitive: filesystem	`+6`	2.4 MB	probablyup

View full report↗︎

github-actions · 2024-12-09T19:34:53Z

No changes to documentation

github-actions · 2024-12-09T19:41:51Z

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 16, 2025 5:24 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (2) -- expand for details

File	Status	Duration	Passed	Skipped	Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 5s	15	0	0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	12s	3	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx	❌ Failed (Inspect)	2m 0s	4	0	2
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	50s	11	7	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	12	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	26s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	14s	3	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	26s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 7s	15	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 30s	21	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	2m 1s	21	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	13s	3	9	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	26s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 42s	21	0	0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	3	0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	3	0

github-actions · 2024-12-09T19:46:14Z

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:30:11 GMT

Benchmark	reference ^{latency of sanity@latest}	experiment ^{latency of this branch}	Δ (%) ^{latency difference}
article (title)	23.3 efps (43ms)	20.8 efps (48ms)	+5ms (+11.6%)	✅
article (body)	63.5 efps (16ms)	63.1 efps (16ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
article (string inside object)	24.4 efps (41ms)	25.6 efps (39ms)	-2ms (-4.9%)	✅
article (string inside array)	21.7 efps (46ms)	21.5 efps (47ms)	+1ms (+1.1%)	✅
recipe (name)	50.0 efps (20ms)	47.6 efps (21ms)	+1ms (+5.0%)	✅
recipe (description)	54.1 efps (19ms)	55.6 efps (18ms)	-1ms (-2.7%)	✅
recipe (instructions)	99.9+ efps (5ms)	99.9+ efps (5ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
synthetic (title)	18.2 efps (55ms)	18.5 efps (54ms)	-1ms (-1.8%)	✅
synthetic (string inside object)	19.2 efps (52ms)	19.2 efps (52ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	43ms	70ms	81ms	533ms	971ms	11.5s
article (body)	16ms	18ms	21ms	59ms	86ms	5.2s
article (string inside object)	41ms	44ms	46ms	147ms	163ms	7.0s
article (string inside array)	46ms	48ms	55ms	208ms	291ms	7.6s
recipe (name)	20ms	21ms	22ms	32ms	0ms	7.9s
recipe (description)	19ms	20ms	24ms	34ms	0ms	4.5s
recipe (instructions)	5ms	7ms	8ms	11ms	0ms	3.1s
synthetic (title)	55ms	58ms	67ms	332ms	1202ms	13.1s
synthetic (string inside object)	52ms	54ms	62ms	426ms	875ms	8.8s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	48ms	69ms	79ms	510ms	1086ms	12.5s
article (body)	16ms	18ms	21ms	160ms	213ms	5.6s
article (string inside object)	39ms	42ms	49ms	254ms	289ms	7.0s
article (string inside array)	47ms	49ms	54ms	219ms	329ms	7.3s
recipe (name)	21ms	23ms	27ms	50ms	0ms	7.7s
recipe (description)	18ms	19ms	21ms	28ms	0ms	4.4s
recipe (instructions)	5ms	6ms	7ms	10ms	0ms	3.1s
synthetic (title)	54ms	58ms	61ms	316ms	989ms	12.6s
synthetic (string inside object)	52ms	58ms	67ms	417ms	591ms	8.4s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".

latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.

p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.

p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.

p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.

blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.

test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

socket-security · 2025-01-13T15:52:59Z

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert	Package	Note	CI
License Policy Violation	npm/next@15.1.0	License: CC-BY-SA-4.0 - Not allowed by license policy (package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE, package/dist/compiled/glob/LICENSE)	⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is a license policy violation?

This package is not allowed per your license policy. Review the package's license to ensure compliance.

Find a package that does not violate your license policy or adjust your policy to allow this package's license.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

@SocketSecurity ignore npm/next@15.1.0

bjoerge

Thank you for this, @rexxars! <3

vercel bot deployed to Preview – test-next-studio December 9, 2024 19:38 View deployment

rexxars force-pushed the upgrade-vite-v6 branch from 647ee30 to cb4738d Compare December 11, 2024 21:15

vercel bot deployed to Preview – performance-studio December 11, 2024 21:22 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – page-building-studio December 11, 2024 21:22 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – test-studio December 11, 2024 21:23 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – test-next-studio December 11, 2024 21:31 View deployment

bjoerge force-pushed the next branch from d2f2254 to 1d75764 Compare December 20, 2024 10:29

binoy14 force-pushed the next branch from 8e29ec5 to babdfe4 Compare December 20, 2024 17:20

rexxars force-pushed the upgrade-vite-v6 branch from cb4738d to 8ccdff6 Compare January 13, 2025 15:51

rexxars marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2025 15:52

rexxars requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2025 15:52

rexxars requested review from RitaDias and bjoerge and removed request for a team January 13, 2025 15:52

vercel bot deployed to Preview – performance-studio January 13, 2025 15:58 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – page-building-studio January 13, 2025 15:58 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – test-studio January 13, 2025 15:59 View deployment

bjoerge previously approved these changes Jan 14, 2025

View reviewed changes

rexxars added 2 commits January 16, 2025 09:05

fix(deps): upgrade vite to v6

537e624

chore: temporary override to make vitest use vite 6

3f128c4

rexxars dismissed bjoerge’s stale review via 53c8612 January 16, 2025 17:07

rexxars force-pushed the upgrade-vite-v6 branch from 8ccdff6 to 53c8612 Compare January 16, 2025 17:07

rexxars requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2025 17:07

rexxars changed the title ~~fix(deps): upgrade vite to v6~~ fix(deps): upgrade vite to v6, vitest to v3 Jan 16, 2025

rexxars force-pushed the upgrade-vite-v6 branch from 53c8612 to 3f128c4 Compare January 16, 2025 17:12

rexxars changed the title ~~fix(deps): upgrade vite to v6, vitest to v3~~ fix(deps): upgrade vite to v6 Jan 16, 2025

vercel bot deployed to Preview – performance-studio January 16, 2025 17:19 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – page-building-studio January 16, 2025 17:19 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – test-studio January 16, 2025 17:21 View deployment

rexxars merged commit 995eeba into next Jan 16, 2025
48 of 49 checks passed

rexxars deleted the upgrade-vite-v6 branch January 16, 2025 17:22

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix(deps): upgrade `vite` to v6 #7995

fix(deps): upgrade `vite` to v6 #7995

rexxars commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

socket-security bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

🏠 Reference result

🧪 Experiment result

📚 Glossary

column definitions

socket-security bot commented Jan 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading

bjoerge left a comment

fix(deps): upgrade vite to v6 #7995

fix(deps): upgrade vite to v6 #7995

Conversation

rexxars commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

Description

What to review

Testing

Notes for release

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

socket-security bot commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024 • edited Loading

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

🏠 Reference result

🧪 Experiment result

📚 Glossary

column definitions

socket-security bot commented Jan 13, 2025 • edited Loading

Next steps

bjoerge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

fix(deps): upgrade `vite` to v6 #7995

fix(deps): upgrade `vite` to v6 #7995

rexxars commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

vercel bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

socket-security bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

socket-security bot commented Jan 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading