Skip to content

Conversation

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

@scottmcm scottmcm commented Dec 10, 2025

Inspired by #general > `Source` link for `core` items is often inscrutable @ 💬 I wanted to add some more examples of the actual wrapping as well as update the documentation to emphasize that the behaviour is unusual.

In particular, now that unbounded_sh[lr] is stable, point people trying to avoid panics to that instead, since it behaves less weirdly.

Rendered example:
image

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 10, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 10, 2025

r? @workingjubilee

rustbot has assigned @workingjubilee.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the wrapping-shift-docs branch from fb36731 to 812137c Compare December 10, 2025 07:54
@scottmcm scottmcm force-pushed the wrapping-shift-docs branch from 812137c to ff43366 Compare December 10, 2025 08:23
#[doc = concat!("assert_eq!(42_", stringify!($SelfT), ".wrapping_shl(", stringify!($BITS), "), 42);")]
#[doc = concat!("assert_eq!(42_", stringify!($SelfT), ".wrapping_shl(1).wrapping_shl(", stringify!($BITS_MINUS_ONE), "), 0);")]
#[doc = concat!("assert_eq!((-1_", stringify!($SelfT), ").wrapping_shl(128), -1);")]
#[doc = concat!("assert_eq!(5_", stringify!($SelfT), ".wrapping_shl(1025), 10);")]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be nice to do some of these examples in binary (0b) or hex (0x), so one can see the bits move better

Copy link
Member

@workingjubilee workingjubilee Dec 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, actually, demonstrating the shift from 0b0101 to 0b1010 sounds nice. Don't have to do it for all of them, ofc.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call; I added a couple more basic examples to show the bits before the extreme examples.

Copy link
Member

@workingjubilee workingjubilee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/// then truncating as needed. The behaviour matches what shift instructions
/// do on many processors, and is what the `<<` operator does when overflow
/// checks are disabled, but numerically it's weird. Consider, instead,
/// using [`Self::unbounded_shl`] which has nicer behaviour.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait, hm.

Is "nicer" quite right? "More numerical" behavior? "As an integer"? "More logical"? "Is more similar to the mul-by-pow-2 operation you were looking for"?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants