Skip to content

Update lint-docs to default to Rust 2024 #140348

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Apr 26, 2025

This updates the lint-docs tool to default to the 2024 edition. The lint docs are supposed to illustrate the code with the latest edition, and I just forgot to update this in #133349.

Some docs needed to add the edition attribute since they were assuming a particular edition, but were missing the explicit annotation.

This also includes a commit to simplify the edition handling in lint-docs.

ehuss added 2 commits April 26, 2025 14:08
This removes the hard-coded list of edition support in the lint-docs
tool, and instead just assumes the edition attribute is something valid.
There isn't a real reason to have this, as rustc will error if given a
wrong number. This should be easier to maintain going forward.
This updates the lint-docs tool to default to the 2024 edition. The lint
docs are supposed to illustrate the code with the latest edition, and I
just forgot to update this in
rust-lang#133349.

Some docs needed to add the `edition` attribute since they were assuming
a particular edition, but were missing the explicit annotation.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 26, 2025

r? @SparrowLii

rustbot has assigned @SparrowLii.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 26, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? compiler-errors @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 27, 2025

📌 Commit 1f108fe has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 27, 2025
tgross35 added a commit to tgross35/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2025
…r-errors

Update lint-docs to default to Rust 2024

This updates the lint-docs tool to default to the 2024 edition. The lint docs are supposed to illustrate the code with the latest edition, and I just forgot to update this in rust-lang#133349.

Some docs needed to add the `edition` attribute since they were assuming a particular edition, but were missing the explicit annotation.

This also includes a commit to simplify the edition handling in lint-docs.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#137439 (Stabilise `std::ffi::c_str`)
 - rust-lang#139031 (Use char::is_whitespace directly in str::trim*)
 - rust-lang#139090 (fix docs for `Peekable::next_if{_eq}`)
 - rust-lang#140220 (Fix detection of main function if there are expressions around it)
 - rust-lang#140297 (Update example to use CStr::to_string_lossy)
 - rust-lang#140330 (Clarified bootstrap optimization "true" argument)
 - rust-lang#140339 (session: Cleanup `CanonicalizedPath::new`)
 - rust-lang#140348 (Update lint-docs to default to Rust 2024)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants