-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert wf sized check on beta #138122
Revert wf sized check on beta #138122
Conversation
r? @wesleywiser rustbot has assigned @wesleywiser. Use |
|
Some changes occurred in tests/rustdoc-json |
Meta tip: rustbot now understands when |
[beta] backports - Windows: Fix error in `fs::rename` on Windows 1607 rust-lang#137528 - rustdoc: when merging target features, keep the highest stability rust-lang#137632 - doctests: fix merging on stable rust-lang#137899 - Revert wf sized check on beta rust-lang#138122 r? cuviper
[beta] backports - Windows: Fix error in `fs::rename` on Windows 1607 rust-lang#137528 - rustdoc: when merging target features, keep the highest stability rust-lang#137632 - doctests: fix merging on stable rust-lang#137899 - Revert wf sized check on beta rust-lang#138122 r? cuviper
Merged in #138525. |
Revert #136274 on beta. See #137186 (comment).
This was fixed by #137298 on master, but that PR includes some non-trivial changes to the way we do typechecking and wfchecking in the compiler, and while I'm confident about the implementation, there is a chance it introduces new cycle errors or something, so I'd prefer if we actually let this bake the proper amount.