Skip to content

Demote i686-pc-windows-gnu to Tier 2 #137869

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

@Noratrieb Noratrieb commented Mar 1, 2025

In accordance with RFC 3771. FCP has been completed.

tracking issue #138422

I also added a stub doc page for the target and renamed the windows-gnullvm page for consistency.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 1, 2025

r? @ehuss

rustbot has assigned @ehuss.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 1, 2025
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member Author

r? Kobzol you can take a look at the CI stuff already

@rustbot rustbot assigned Kobzol and unassigned ehuss Mar 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Kobzol Kobzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Infra changes look good, left one comment. Good riddance, 32-bit legacy mess!

@@ -528,31 +527,6 @@ auto:
# came from the mingw-w64 SourceForge download site. Unfortunately
# SourceForge is notoriously flaky, so we mirror it on our own infrastructure.

# i686-mingw is split into three jobs to run tests in parallel.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

@Noratrieb Noratrieb force-pushed the Now_I_am_become_death,_the_destroyer_of_i686-pc-windows-gnu branch 2 times, most recently from 5e115aa to 77677fe Compare March 9, 2025 12:01
@Noratrieb Noratrieb marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 20:35
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 11, 2025

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member Author

r? workingjubilee

I want to give you the honor of the bors r plus

@Noratrieb Noratrieb force-pushed the Now_I_am_become_death,_the_destroyer_of_i686-pc-windows-gnu branch from 77677fe to 78db5a6 Compare March 24, 2025 19:06
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

Want to hear a joke?

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 2, 2025

📌 Commit 78db5a6 has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 2, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 2, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #139229) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 2, 2025
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member Author

that was an exceptionally good joke but now i have merge conflicts

In accordance with RFC 3771.

I also added a stub doc page for the target and renamed the
windows-gnullvm page for consistency.
@Noratrieb Noratrieb force-pushed the Now_I_am_become_death,_the_destroyer_of_i686-pc-windows-gnu branch from 78db5a6 to 6a1f57d Compare April 2, 2025 19:41
@Noratrieb Noratrieb added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 2, 2025
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

"32-bit Windows GNU".

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 2, 2025

📌 Commit 6a1f57d has been approved by workingjubilee

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 2, 2025
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
…he_destroyer_of_i686-pc-windows-gnu, r=workingjubilee

Demote i686-pc-windows-gnu to Tier 2

In accordance with [RFC 3771](rust-lang/rfcs#3771). FCP has been completed.

tracking issue rust-lang#138422

I also added a stub doc page for the target and renamed the windows-gnullvm page for consistency.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#137869 (Demote i686-pc-windows-gnu to Tier 2)
 - rust-lang#137880 (Autodiff batching)
 - rust-lang#138546 (Add integer to string formatting tests)
 - rust-lang#138947 (Refactor Apple version handling in the compiler)
 - rust-lang#138950 (replace extra_filename with strict version hash in metrics file names)
 - rust-lang#139213 (Run coretests and alloctests with cg_clif in CI)
 - rust-lang#139274 (Rustdoc: typecheck settings.js)
 - rust-lang#139295 (Remove creation of duplicate `AnonPipe`)
 - rust-lang#139298 (Allow for missing invisible close delim when reparsing an expression.)
 - rust-lang#139313 (Deduplicate some `rustc_middle` function bodies by calling the `rustc_type_ir` equivalent)
 - rust-lang#139317 (compiletest: Encapsulate all of the code that touches libtest)
 - rust-lang#139322 (Add helper function for checking LLD usage to `run-make-support`)
 - rust-lang#139335 (Pass correct param-env to `error_implies`)
 - rust-lang#139342 (Add a mailmap entry for myself)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#138949 (Rename `is_like_osx` to `is_like_darwin`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
…he_destroyer_of_i686-pc-windows-gnu, r=workingjubilee

Demote i686-pc-windows-gnu to Tier 2

In accordance with [RFC 3771](rust-lang/rfcs#3771). FCP has been completed.

tracking issue rust-lang#138422

I also added a stub doc page for the target and renamed the windows-gnullvm page for consistency.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 4, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 6a1f57d with merge 5337252...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 4, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: workingjubilee
Pushing 5337252 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 4, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 5337252 into rust-lang:master Apr 4, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.88.0 milestone Apr 4, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2025

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing b8ff7b6 (parent) -> 5337252 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Job duration changes

  1. x86_64-apple-2: 3902.0s -> 7216.6s (84.9%)
  2. x86_64-apple-1: 7376.5s -> 8883.2s (20.4%)
  3. x86_64-mingw-1: 9141.6s -> 9826.8s (7.5%)
  4. dist-x86_64-msvc-alt: 7256.3s -> 7729.3s (6.5%)
  5. aarch64-gnu: 6464.3s -> 6859.3s (6.1%)
  6. x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-2: 6091.1s -> 6367.9s (4.5%)
  7. x86_64-gnu-nopt: 5643.6s -> 5808.0s (2.9%)
  8. x86_64-gnu-llvm-18-3: 6772.5s -> 6955.5s (2.7%)
  9. dist-x86_64-apple: 9223.4s -> 9453.0s (2.5%)
  10. dist-various-2: 3341.2s -> 3422.2s (2.4%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@bors bors mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2025
@Noratrieb Noratrieb deleted the Now_I_am_become_death,_the_destroyer_of_i686-pc-windows-gnu branch April 4, 2025 19:38
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (5337252): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 3.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.1% [3.1%, 3.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.1% [3.1%, 3.1%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 781.07s -> 779.508s (-0.20%)
Artifact size: 365.97 MiB -> 365.96 MiB (-0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants