Use the new solver in the impossible_predicates

[compiler-errors]

r? lcnr

[compiler-errors]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 42565da with merge 6aac808...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 6aac808 (6aac80825ffa245e49ce6e80bdcfdc433dbb3559)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (6aac808): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.6%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.1%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.6%, secondary -2.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.3%, -0.9%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.9%	[-3.7%, -2.4%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.6%	[-2.3%, -0.9%]	2

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[2.5%, 2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 788.486s -> 790.527s (0.26%)
Artifact size: 347.76 MiB -> 347.72 MiB (-0.01%)

[compiler-errors]

Ok let me fix AFIDT first.

@rustbot author

[compiler-errors]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

(and crater)

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 40269a1 with merge 4c525d4...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 4c525d4 (4c525d43052e921548191f82f6ed9e2f9e98dcb1)

[compiler-errors]

@craterbot check

[craterbot]

👌 Experiment pr-136988 created and queued.
🤖 Automatically detected try build 4c525d4
🔍 You can check out the queue and this experiment's details.

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (4c525d4): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.6%	[0.2%, 1.2%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.4%, secondary -2.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.4%	[1.4%, 1.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.5%	[-3.2%, -2.2%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.4%	[1.4%, 1.4%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary -1.5%, secondary 3.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[2.7%, 3.5%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.5%	[-1.5%, -1.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.5%	[-1.5%, -1.5%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 773.717s -> 773.018s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 365.52 MiB -> 365.55 MiB (0.01%)

[craterbot]

🚧 Experiment pr-136988 is now running

ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more