Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a codegen test for optimization with const arrays #134852

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

alex
Copy link
Member

@alex alex commented Dec 28, 2024

Closes #107208

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 28, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 28, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@durin42
Copy link
Contributor

durin42 commented Dec 28, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 28, 2024

📌 Commit 082d69e has been approved by durin42

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 28, 2024
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Dec 28, 2024

(For next time, it would be cool to squash commits)

@alex
Copy link
Member Author

alex commented Dec 28, 2024

If it's not too late, I can squash this now?

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Dec 28, 2024

If you have the time, sure, otherwise don’t worry about it.

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Dec 28, 2024

it’s not in a rollup yet so there’s still time, so here’s a temporary:

@bors r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 28, 2024
@alex
Copy link
Member Author

alex commented Dec 28, 2024

Done

@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented Dec 28, 2024

Thanks Alex!

@bors r=durin42 rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 28, 2024

📌 Commit d6c73eb has been approved by durin42

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 28, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134849 (compiletest: Slightly simplify the handling of debugger directive prefixes)
 - rust-lang#134850 (Document virality of `feature(rustc_private)`)
 - rust-lang#134852 (Added a codegen test for optimization with const arrays)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0a52407 into rust-lang:master Dec 29, 2024
6 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134852 - alex:patch-1, r=durin42

Added a codegen test for optimization with const arrays

Closes rust-lang#107208
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 29, 2024
@alex alex deleted the patch-1 branch December 29, 2024 03:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

missed(?) optimization with a const array of same item
7 participants