Skip to content

Conversation

@ChrisCho-H
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure whether it's intentional, but this pattern(match and then if) could make lexer little slower for OP_CSV and OP_CLTV(and Error::InvalidOpcode) as they aren't caught in match arms but if block like below(which causes additional check).

...
script::Instruction::Op(op) => {
                if op == opcodes::all::OP_CSV {
                    ret.push(Token::CheckSequenceVerify);
                } else if op == opcodes::all::OP_CLTV {
                    ret.push(Token::CheckLockTimeVerify);
                } else {
                    return Err(Error::InvalidOpcode(op))
                }
}

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK aa722c2; successfully ran local tests; nice!

Copy link
Member

@sanket1729 sanket1729 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK aa722c2

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit 76b27da into rust-bitcoin:master Nov 25, 2024
30 checks passed
heap-coder added a commit to heap-coder/rust-miniscript that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
…heck on match lex

aa722c228c80aabb1e2e3a7a0f0fe5f4e348c444 feat: remove inefficient if check on match lex (ChrisCho-H)

Pull request description:

  I'm not sure whether it's intentional, but this pattern(match and then if) could make lexer little slower for `OP_CSV` and `OP_CLTV`(and `Error::InvalidOpcode`) as they aren't caught in match arms but `if` block like below(which causes additional check).

  ```rust
  ...
  script::Instruction::Op(op) => {
                  if op == opcodes::all::OP_CSV {
                      ret.push(Token::CheckSequenceVerify);
                  } else if op == opcodes::all::OP_CLTV {
                      ret.push(Token::CheckLockTimeVerify);
                  } else {
                      return Err(Error::InvalidOpcode(op))
                  }
  }
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK aa722c228c80aabb1e2e3a7a0f0fe5f4e348c444; successfully ran local tests; nice!
  sanket1729:
    ACK aa722c228c80aabb1e2e3a7a0f0fe5f4e348c444

Tree-SHA512: d538e9f064cdb55fc2e8cbb8e56532a0ebe0563e9b1227c9a9a84140e5f23c22663ea2a976a8ac19e69bbbb7eb8b517b54d04ea7759747f2dc8370f5f45f0255
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants