Added rtdetr method

[Bhavay-2001]

Description

Fixes issue #1418

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• This change requires a documentation update

How has this change been tested, please provide a testcase or example of how you tested the change?

Colab notebook

Any specific deployment considerations

For example, documentation changes, usability, usage/costs, secrets, etc.

Docs

• Docs updated? What were the changes:

Reviewer - @LinasKo @SkalskiP

[LinasKo]

Hi @Bhavay-2001,

I see this is coming from transformers. If that's the case, the model should already be supported via the from_transformers connector.

Note that we may not support post_process_object_detection yet (only the legacy post_process method), but that is already being worked on, on PR #1386.

Are transformers the primary framework for calling this model?

[Bhavay-2001]

Hi @Bhavay-2001,

I see this is coming from transformers. If that's the case, the model should already be supported via the from_transformers connector.

Note that we may not support post_process_object_detection yet (only the legacy post_process method), but that is already being worked on, on PR #1386.

Are transformers the primary framework for calling this model?

Yes, I am loading this model from the transformers library of hugging face.

[Bhavay-2001]

Hi @LinasKo, should I close this one for now?

[LinasKo]

Hey @Bhavay-2001,

Yes, let's close it for now. Thank you for keeping your eyes open for potential improvements. Apologies for not stopping you a bit earlier - I wasn't sure if RT-DETR is standalone or primarily a transformers model. Could have saved you a bit of time 😅

[Bhavay-2001]

No worries. There is this issue which requires work on obb. I have worked on obb before so should I try to work on this one?

[SkalskiP]

Hi, @Bhavay-2001 👋🏻 from_transformers works with the RT-DETR transformers model. Take a look here for reference.

[SkalskiP]

No worries. There is this issue which requires work on obb. I have worked on obb before so should I try to work on this one?

@Bhavay-2001 I think we should finish work on #1409 first.

[Bhavay-2001]

No worries. There is this issue which requires work on obb. I have worked on obb before so should I try to work on this one?

@Bhavay-2001 I think we should finish work on #1409 first.

Alright, pls review it whenever you find the time.
Thanks