Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ghcr.io/robert-koch-institut/mex-backend Docker tag to v0.29.0 #235

Merged

Conversation

RKIMetadataExchange
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
ghcr.io/robert-koch-institut/mex-backend service minor 0.28.0 -> 0.29.0

Release Notes

robert-koch-institut/mex-backend (ghcr.io/robert-koch-institut/mex-backend)

v0.29.0

Compare Source

Changes
  • add support for full text queries on nested models to find extracted/rule/merged items
  • optimize extracted/rule/merged search queries by applying sorting and pagination
    before pulling in nested models as well as identifiers from referenced merged items
    and by replacing subqueries with cypher "pattern comprehension" syntax
  • prefix components in merged queries with _, to be more harmonious with _refs
  • add email fields to SEARCHABLE_FIELDS and SEARCHABLE_CLASSES (stop-gap MX-1766)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@RKIMetadataExchange RKIMetadataExchange self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@cutoffthetop cutoffthetop merged commit 44b0a53 into main Jan 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@cutoffthetop cutoffthetop deleted the renovate/ghcr.io-robert-koch-institut-mex-backend-0.x branch January 24, 2025 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants