Skip to content

chore(api-keys): add last_used_at field to list fixtures#161

Open
drish wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
chore/api-keys-last-used-at
Open

chore(api-keys): add last_used_at field to list fixtures#161
drish wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
chore/api-keys-last-used-at

Conversation

@drish
Copy link
Member

@drish drish commented Mar 14, 2026

No description provided.

@drish drish requested review from gabrielmfern and joaopcm March 14, 2026 14:49
Copy link
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 issue found across 1 file

Confidence score: 3/5

  • There is a concrete, high-confidence issue in spec/api_keys_spec.rb: assertions use symbol keys for ApiKeys.list items, but nested hashes are not symbolized, so the spec will read nil and fail.
  • Because this is severity 6/10 with confidence 10/10, there is meaningful merge risk (likely CI/test failure), even if runtime behavior may be unaffected.
  • Pay close attention to spec/api_keys_spec.rb - key type mismatch in nested response item assertions can cause false failures.
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="spec/api_keys_spec.rb">

<violation number="1" location="spec/api_keys_spec.rb:61">
P2: Use string keys for fields on items returned from `ApiKeys.list`; nested response hashes are not symbolized here, so this assertion will read `nil` and fail.

(Based on your team's feedback about nested response items using string keys.) [FEEDBACK_USED]</violation>
</file>

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants