Repository navigation
feat: prove approvals without exposing private audit data - #9
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Value
A customer or auditor can verify that a direct human approval met quorum without receiving the customer payload, reviewer identity, workflow name, timestamp, or vote counts.
What ships
draftcat zk-receipt key-id|prove|verifyEvidence
go test ./...go vet ./...Review boundary
This is explicitly labeled an experimental preview. The checked-in Groth16 keys come from a single-party development setup and the circuit has not been independently audited. The docs require a multiparty ceremony or suitable transparent system plus an audit before production reliance.