fix: change old twitter links

Removed the #! in the url

public/blog/css-parent-selector.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # CSS selector for :parent targeting (please)
 
-[Me this weekend](https://twitter.com/#!/rem/status/26934643630):
+[Me this weekend](https://twitter.com/rem/status/26934643630):
 
 > I can't count the number of times I've cursed CSS for not having a :parent pseudo selector: a img:parent { background: none; }
 
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The what followed was some going back and forth with people who have thought thi
 
 ## :has selector
 
-Originally I felt that a :parent pseudo selector would do the trick, but [Stuart pointed out](http://twitter.com/#!/sil/status/26934925820) that selectors syntax doesn't work that way, it's always left to right determines depth.
+Originally I felt that a :parent pseudo selector would do the trick, but [Stuart pointed out](http://twitter.com/sil/status/26934925820) that selectors syntax doesn't work that way, it's always left to right determines depth.
 
 So thinking about it some more, I felt that using a :has() selector would complement the :not() selector really well. Something like this:
 

public/blog/input-range-polyfill.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ With `<input type=range>` the apps looked great. Then I opened them in Firefox 5
 
 Good thing that during James' Q&A session at The Highland Fling I wrote the solution he was describing :)
 
-<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/jackosborne/status/89370027802902528"><img alt="Jack watching me code" src="/images/jack-watching-me-code.png" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto;" /></a>
+<a href="https://twitter.com/jackosborne/status/89370027802902528"><img alt="Jack watching me code" src="/images/jack-watching-me-code.png" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto;" /></a>
 
 ## Solution
 

public/blog/training-and-events.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ There's a number of upcoming events I wanted to blog about, partly to lend a han
 
 Workshops over the last 12 months have really increased for me - both in public workshops (often via events) and private company workshops. I've now finally got so much HTML5 content that companies can now create a "pick and mix" HTML5 workshop spanning over anything from 1 to 4 days.
 
-I'm up in Manchester next week doing private workshops for the BBC on mobile web dev. Possibly [my favourite quote](https://twitter.com/#!/sparrk/status/156437912546836481) from the last time I ran this event was from James O'Brien aka @sparrk:
+I'm up in Manchester next week doing private workshops for the BBC on mobile web dev. Possibly [my favourite quote](https://twitter.com/sparrk/status/156437912546836481) from the last time I ran this event was from James O'Brien aka @sparrk:
 
 > Remy's HTML5 for mobile workshop showed me how to do at least three things I'd previously thought were impossible.
 

public/blog/vendor-prefixes-about-to-go-south.md

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ The fear the browsers have, understandably, is that developers are coding for we
 
 Now that `-webkit` prefixes are so prolific in the wild (not my statement, but as suggested from the meeting minute notes), it seems the approach most want in the CSS working group is to simply implement the non-standard feature in to their specification. An oversimplification, but worryingly true.
 
-There is some voice of sanity, namely in [Daniel Glazman / glazou](https://twitter.com/#!/glazou) and Peter Linss.
+There is some voice of sanity, namely in [Daniel Glazman / glazou](https://twitter.com/glazou) and Peter Linss.
 
 You have to still appreciate the politics of the problem: