Skip to content

RHIDP-9238: Troubleshooting Guide #1628

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
Gerry-Forde merged 14 commits into from
Dec 11, 2025
Merged

RHIDP-9238: Troubleshooting Guide #1628

Gerry-Forde merged 14 commits into from
Dec 11, 2025

Conversation

@jmagak
Copy link
Member

@jmagak jmagak commented Dec 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@rhdh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

rhdh-bot commented Dec 8, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Updated preview: https://redhat-developer.github.io/red-hat-developers-documentation-rhdh/pr-1628/ @ 12/11/25 13:01:27

@jmagak jmagak force-pushed the RHIDP-9238-Troubleshooting-Guide branch from 3d5bf6d to 8aaf9bb Compare December 8, 2025 18:52
@jmagak jmagak force-pushed the RHIDP-9238-Troubleshooting-Guide branch from 9628241 to 3f6014c Compare December 9, 2025 17:08
@jmagak jmagak marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2025 09:30
gabriel-farache
gabriel-farache suggested changes Dec 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@gabriel-farache gabriel-farache left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

review for proc-troubleshooting-missing-workflows.adoc

pkliczewski
pkliczewski reviewed Dec 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
elai-shalev
elai-shalev reviewed Dec 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@elai-shalev elai-shalev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmagak overall loos good, added some comments

@elai-shalev
Copy link

elai-shalev commented Dec 10, 2025

@jmagak
One additional thing I had in mind, we have this blog post on many different customer questions which are toubleshoot related.
Maybe some of the information from there could be integrated to the troubleshooting section of the docs.
@pkliczewski wdyt?

@pkliczewski
Copy link

pkliczewski commented Dec 10, 2025

Maybe some of the information from there could be integrated to the troubleshooting section of the docs. @pkliczewski wdyt?

Good pointer @elai-shalev . It would be great to add this blog post to this section

@jmagak
Copy link
Member Author

jmagak commented Dec 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Maybe some of the information from there could be integrated to the troubleshooting section of the docs.

Great suggestion, @elai-shalev and @pkliczewski. How about I work on this separately by introducing a section like what we have here, in our docs?

@jmagak jmagak requested a review from elai-shalev December 10, 2025 12:44
@elai-shalev
Copy link

elai-shalev commented Dec 10, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Maybe some of the information from there could be integrated to the troubleshooting section of the docs.

Great suggestion, @elai-shalev and @pkliczewski. How about I work on this separately by introducing a section like what we have here, in our docs?

This Q&A section like the example will work, looks good. I agree it could be in another PR

elai-shalev
elai-shalev reviewed Dec 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@elai-shalev elai-shalev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More comments

@jmagak jmagak force-pushed the RHIDP-9238-Troubleshooting-Guide branch from afd6933 to d2ada27 Compare December 11, 2025 12:29
elai-shalev
elai-shalev approved these changes Dec 11, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@elai-shalev elai-shalev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@jmagak
Copy link
Member Author

jmagak commented Dec 11, 2025

/cherry-pick release-1.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 11, 2025

@jmagak: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.7 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmagak
Copy link
Member Author

jmagak commented Dec 11, 2025

/cherry-pick release-1.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 11, 2025

@jmagak: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.8 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Gerry-Forde Gerry-Forde merged commit addebcb into redhat-developer:main Dec 11, 2025
5 checks passed
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 11, 2025

@jmagak: new pull request created: #1642

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Dec 11, 2025

@jmagak: new pull request created: #1643

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pabel-rh pabel-rh pabel-rh approved these changes

+4 more reviewers

@pkliczewski pkliczewski pkliczewski left review comments

@y-first y-first y-first left review comments

@gabriel-farache gabriel-farache gabriel-farache approved these changes

@elai-shalev elai-shalev elai-shalev approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Peer review done 📘 Ready to merge 💂 Technical review done ⛅ Any procedure has been succesfully tested

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants

@jmagak @rhdh-bot @elai-shalev @pkliczewski @openshift-cherrypick-robot @gabriel-farache @y-first @pabel-rh @Gerry-Forde