Skip to content

Conversation

@KunWuLuan
Copy link
Contributor

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

to #4345

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

SCRIPT_ROOT=$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/..
ROOT_PKG=github.com/ray-project/kuberay/ray-operator
CODEGEN_PKG=$(go list -m -f "{{.Dir}}" k8s.io/code-generator)
CODEGEN_PKG=${CODEGEN_PKG:-$(cd "${SCRIPT_ROOT}"; ls -d -1 ./vendor/k8s.io/code-generator 2>/dev/null || echo ../code-generator)}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you explain the reason for this change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

go vendor is enabled in my environment, and $(go list -m -f "{{.Dir}}" k8s.io/code-generator) return "" when go vendor is enabled. I have rollbacked this change.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh cool, I think we can create an issue for go vendor users.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

@win5923 win5923 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are all of the files fully generated?

@KunWuLuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are all of the files fully generated?

It seems that the CRD yamls are not updated. I have updated.

@KunWuLuan KunWuLuan force-pushed the refector/client-1.35 branch from 6636ce6 to 7f8fad7 Compare January 7, 2026 01:42
@KunWuLuan KunWuLuan force-pushed the refector/client-1.35 branch from 7f8fad7 to f201498 Compare January 7, 2026 01:48
@KunWuLuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@win5923 Hi, I think the comments are all solved. Thanks for your comments. Can you review the code again?

@CheyuWu CheyuWu self-requested a review January 7, 2026 16:21
@win5923
Copy link
Collaborator

win5923 commented Jan 7, 2026

cc @Future-Outlier and @rueian for the final review!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants