Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update setulb call from Scipy for updated signature of 1.15 #6207

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: branch-25.02
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dantegd
Copy link
Member

@dantegd dantegd commented Jan 5, 2025

Resolves the immediate update identified in #6206, we still should update things to not use internals of Scipy.

Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Jan 5, 2025

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Cython / Python Cython or Python issue label Jan 5, 2025
@dantegd dantegd added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jan 5, 2025
@@ -175,12 +175,11 @@ def fprime_f(x):
wa[ib],
iwa[ib],
task[ib],
iprint,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also remove this from the functions' signature if it has no more effect?

@betatim
Copy link
Member

betatim commented Jan 6, 2025

Looks reasonable. One thought I had: can we make it so that cuml works with both scipy < 1.15 and scipy >= 1.15? That would mean having some shim/compatibility built in at the point where we make use of the internal function.

If we don't make it work with multiple versions, then we should bump the minimum version required in the dependencies.

I have a slight preference for supporting several scipy versions instead of increasing the minimum version to 1.15 which is brand new.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Member

/ok to test

@dantegd dantegd marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2025 02:39
@dantegd dantegd requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 02:39
@dantegd dantegd requested review from cjnolet and bdice January 7, 2025 02:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working Cython / Python Cython or Python issue non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants