Skip to content

Conversation

@caliskanugur
Copy link
Member

  • Moves auth package to clients
  • Adds auth as a client to the rancher.Client - uses management client mainly, and uses the same session instantiated for the clients
  • Adds a new function to refresh provider access group in users
  • Adds update method to OLDAP

Copy link
Contributor

@igomez06 igomez06 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs an update after last PR, but LGTM

joesims22
joesims22 previously approved these changes Oct 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@joesims22 joesims22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@anupama2501
Copy link
Contributor

Have a few conflicts. could you rebase please.

dasarinaidu
dasarinaidu previously approved these changes Apr 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@dasarinaidu dasarinaidu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, please rebase and merge. Thanks

…existing login method default to local provider, add a new function to refresh group for users
@caliskanugur
Copy link
Member Author

caliskanugur commented Apr 11, 2025

Rebased from 83 commits:

  • Removed RBAC extensions accordingly since it is moved to actions.
  • Updated the clients bits accordingly.

Since there were so many changes that happened to both Shepherd and Clients, this PR is no longer safe to merge before the sanity checks.

After sanity checks for the tests that use this PR are provided, we can review this PR, assigning you to this PR @dasarinaidu since we discussed the test part of this offline

Copy link
Contributor

@igomez06 igomez06 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@igomez06 igomez06 self-requested a review April 11, 2025 21:22
Copy link
Contributor

@igomez06 igomez06 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will wait on sanity checks per Ugur's message

@caliskanugur caliskanugur requested a review from igomez06 April 11, 2025 21:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants