Skip to content

Conversation

@zhravan
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhravan zhravan commented Nov 18, 2025

Issue

Link to related issue(s):


Description

Short summary of what this PR changes or introduces.


Scope of Change

Select all applicable areas impacted by this PR:

  • View (UI/UX)
  • API
  • CLI
  • Infra / Deployment
  • Docs
  • Other (specify): ________

Screenshot / Video / GIF (if applicable)

Attach or embed screenshots, screen recordings, or GIFs demonstrating the feature or fix.


Related PRs (if any)

Link any related or dependent PRs across repos.


Additional Notes for Reviewers (optional)

Anything reviewers should know before testing or merging (e.g., environment variables, setup steps).


Developer Checklist

To be completed by the developer who raised the PR.

  • Add valid/relevant title for the PR
  • Self-review done
  • Manual dev testing done
  • No secrets exposed
  • No merge conflicts
  • Docs added/updated (if applicable)
  • Removed debug prints / secrets / sensitive data
  • Unit / Integration tests passing
  • Follows all standards defined in Nixopus Docs

Reviewer Checklist

To be completed by the reviewer before merge.

  • Peer review done
  • No console.logs / fmt.prints left
  • No secrets exposed
  • If any DB migrations, migration changes are verified
  • Verified release changes are production-ready

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features
    • Added Sponsors section to README featuring sponsor logos and links
    • Introduced "View All Sponsors & Partnerships" call-to-action button linking to dedicated sponsor page
    • New sponsor added and existing sponsor information updated with enhanced details

@zhravan zhravan marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2025 09:28
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Walkthrough

These changes enhance sponsor visibility across the documentation by adding a Sponsors section to the README with a two-column table, introducing a call-to-action button below the sponsor marquee, and updating the sponsors data file with a new sponsor entry and refined sponsor information.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Sponsors Documentation & UI
README.md, docs/.vitepress/components/SponsorsMarquee.vue
Added Sponsors section to README with sponsor logos and links in a two-column table layout. Added a call-to-action button ("View All Sponsors & Partnerships") below the sponsor marquee with corresponding CSS styling for hover states, dark mode, and responsive adjustments.
Sponsors Data
docs/public/sponsor/sponsors.json
Added new sponsor entry (Lets Cloud) with metadata fields. Enhanced HostUp entry with explicit type and contribution fields and description. Updated sponsor handle from "@Shravan20" to "@zhravan" with corresponding GitHub URL change.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

  • Verify sponsor information accuracy and link validity
  • Confirm CSS styling is responsive and consistent with existing design system
  • Check that JSON data structure is valid and all fields are populated correctly

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: readme redesign #400: Directly inverse—that PR removed the Sponsors section from README, while this PR adds it back with enhancements.

Suggested reviewers

  • raghavyuva

Poem

🐰 A sponsors section now shines so bright,
With logos gleaming left and right,
A call-to-action leads the way,
New partners join us here to stay,
The rabbit hops with sponsor glee! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'feat: add letscloud.io partnership' directly corresponds to the main changes: adding a new Lets Cloud sponsor entry, updating sponsor UI components, and introducing a CTA section for sponsors.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch partnership-letscloud

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (1)

93-99: Sponsors section looks good; consider local assets and alt text tweaks

The new Sponsors block reads well and is consistent with the sponsor data. To harden it a bit:

  • Consider hosting the logos in-repo (e.g., under docs/public/sponsor/ or assets/) instead of hotlinking gstatic/linkedin so README rendering isn’t dependent on third‑party CDNs or tokenized URLs.
  • Optionally align alt text to the brand names (“Lets Cloud”, “HostUp”) for slightly better accessibility and screen‑reader output.
docs/.vitepress/components/SponsorsMarquee.vue (1)

39-43: CTA integration under marquee looks consistent; double‑check /sponsor/ target and states

The new “View All Sponsors & Partnerships” CTA fits nicely with the existing design, and the styling is consistent with the brand colors and responsive rules.

Two small things to verify:

  • The /sponsor/ route (or page) is present and deployed in the docs site so this CTA doesn’t 404.
  • You’re okay with the CTA showing even when sponsors are in loading/error state (since it’s outside the v-else block). If you want it hidden in those cases, it should move inside the successful‑load branch.

Also applies to: 359-404

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f34c28 and 81ebe0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/.vitepress/components/SponsorsMarquee.vue (2 hunks)
  • docs/public/sponsor/sponsors.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/public/sponsor/sponsors.json (1)

2-10: Sponsor data shape matches UI expectations; confirm copy and links with partners

The new Lets Cloud entry and the updated @zhravan record look structurally correct and compatible with the marquee component (name/avatar/type/website/github are all present and consistent).

Given this is outward‑facing partnership content, it’s worth double‑checking:

  • The Lets Cloud offer text ($300 credit, 1‑click install, complimentary VPS) matches the actual agreed‑upon terms.
  • The GitHub URLs (letscloud-community, zhravan) and websites are the ones the sponsors expect to be highlighted.

Also applies to: 20-25

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants