Skip to content

Automated Resyntax fixes #497

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Automated Resyntax fixes #497

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 1 file.

  • Fixed 7 occurrences of provide/contract-to-contract-out
  • Fixed 4 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of map-to-for
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of when-expression-in-for-loop-to-when-keyword
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of arrow-contract-with-rest-to-arrow-contract-with-ellipses
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of if-else-false-to-and
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of nested-if-to-cond

resyntax-ci bot added 7 commits April 16, 2025 00:17
The `provide/contract` form is a legacy form made obsolete by `contract-out`.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
…-ellipses`

This `->*` contract can be rewritten using `->` with ellipses.
This `map` operation can be replaced with a `for/list` loop.
Use the `#:when` keyword instead of `when` to reduce loop body indentation.
This `if` expression can be refactored to an equivalent expression using `and`.
This `if`-`else` chain can be converted to a `cond` expression.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants