Skip to content

Economic performance of electricity production technologies #3267

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: economic-insights
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kaskranenburgQ
Copy link
Contributor

@kaskranenburgQ kaskranenburgQ commented Jun 4, 2025

This PR adds the queries for the table Economic performance of electricity production technologies.

The queries for the revenue are not working at this time.
This column is hidden for now on the ETModel branch.

For testing purposes please use the following branches:

  • ETEngine: economic-insights
  • ETModel: economic-insights

@kaskranenburgQ kaskranenburgQ requested a review from mabijkerk June 4, 2025 06:38
@kaskranenburgQ kaskranenburgQ force-pushed the economic-insights-1a branch from d29b3d7 to 7006cb2 Compare June 4, 2025 09:03
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
# Revenue of power plant, based on hourly revenue calculations

- query = V(energy_battery_solar_pv_solar_radiation, revenue_per(:mwh_electricity))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did we come to a conclusion on how revenue of such a plant should be handled? In principle it is possible to set the grid connection capacity to zero, meaning that all electricity will be curtailed. Doesn't this mean that the revenue will then be incorrectly calculated?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't have a uniform conclusion or approach yet how to cope with these parks. Therefore, it is decided to remove the technologies of battery combined with solar PV or wind turbines and the hybrid offshore wind from the table.

Copy link
Member

@mabijkerk mabijkerk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Structure looks good. I can't really review it properly because my local model is not running. My main remaining question is concernd with the integrated battery systems for wind and solar: how do we deal with revenue there?

@kaskranenburgQ kaskranenburgQ requested a review from kndehaan June 4, 2025 11:31
kndehaan added 3 commits June 5, 2025 15:39
…able

It's not clear yeat how costs of such combined parks are defined yet. Until we have a uniform approach for this, it is decided to exclude these technologies from the table.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants