test0421 #35
test0421 #35
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update addresses typographical and grammatical errors in the documentation for the checkpoint backup feature in TiDB v6.5.0. Corrections include fixing misspelled words and improving phrasing in the introductory and application scenario sections. No technical content, logic, or public entity declarations were changed. Changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @qiancai, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request updates the br/br-checkpoint-backup.md file, which documents the checkpoint backup feature in TiDB's Backup & Restore (BR) tool. The changes involve minor typo corrections and grammatical improvements to enhance clarity and readability. Specifically, 'due t recoverable errors' is corrected to 'due to recoverable errors', 'B' is added to 'Backup & Restore (B)', and 'cannot affords' is corrected to 'cannot afford'.
Highlights
- Typos: Corrects typos in the document, such as fixing 'due t recoverable errors' to 'due to recoverable errors'.
- Grammar: Improves grammar by changing 'cannot affords' to 'cannot afford'.
- Clarity: Enhances clarity by adding 'B' to 'Backup & Restore (B)'.
Changelog
- br/br-checkpoint-backup.md
- Corrected 'due t recoverable errors' to 'due to recoverable errors'.
- Added 'B' to 'Backup & Restore (B)'.
- Corrected 'cannot affords' to 'cannot afford'.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request includes changes to several markdown files related to Backup and Restore (BR) functionality in TiDB. The changes primarily focus on correcting typos and grammatical errors. Overall, the changes seem straightforward and aim to improve the clarity and readability of the documentation.
Summary of Findings
- Typos and Grammatical Errors: Several instances of typos and grammatical errors were identified and corrected across multiple files. These corrections enhance the overall quality and professionalism of the documentation.
- Inconsistent Terminology: There's a minor inconsistency in the use of 't' vs 'to' in one of the files, which has been addressed to ensure consistency.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request are relatively minor and primarily address typos and grammatical errors. Given the low severity of the identified issues, the pull request is likely suitable for merging after addressing the suggested changes. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces changes to the Backup & Restore (BR) documentation. The changes primarily focus on correcting typos and grammatical errors in the br/br-checkpoint-backup.md file. Overall, the changes are straightforward and aim to improve the clarity and readability of the documentation.
Summary of Findings
- Typos and Grammatical Errors: The pull request addresses several typos and grammatical errors in the
br/br-checkpoint-backup.mdfile, enhancing the overall quality of the documentation. - Clarity and Readability: The corrections contribute to improved clarity and readability, making the documentation easier to understand for TiDB users.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is ready for merging. The changes are minor and address typos and grammatical errors, improving the quality of the documentation. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
br/br-checkpoint-backup.md (1)
2-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd relevant hyperlinks to fix link checker failure.
The Lychee link checker reports no links in this document, causing pipeline failures. Please add hyperlinks to related documentation (for example, the BR tool reference or PD GC safepoint docs) to improve navigability and satisfy the link-checker.Would you like me to propose specific link additions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
br/br-checkpoint-backup.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.md`: As a technical writer in the database area, you need to first learn the changes in this PR, and then improve the content to make it clear, concise, and easy to understan...
**/*.md: As a technical writer in the database area, you need to first learn the changes in this PR, and then improve the content to make it clear, concise, and easy to understand in English according to your database knowledge.
br/br-checkpoint-backup.md
🪛 LanguageTool
br/br-checkpoint-backup.md
[grammar] ~15-~15: The modal verb ‘cannot’ requires the verb’s base form.
Context: ...f your TiDB cluster is large and cannot affords to backup again after a failure, you ca...
(MD_BASEFORM)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Links (Fail Fast)
br/br-checkpoint-backup.md
[error] 1-1: Lychee link checker found no links in the markdown file. This usually indicates a configuration error. The step failed with exit code 1.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: tidb-cloud-check
- GitHub Check: tidb-check
| # Checkpoint Backup | ||
|
|
||
| Snapshot backup might be interrupted due to recoverable errors, such as disk exhaustion and node crash. Before TiDB v6.5.0, data that is backed up before the interruption would be invalidated even after the error is addressed, and you need to start the backup from scratch. For large clusters, this incurs considerable extra cost. | ||
| Snapshot backup might be interrupted due t recoverable errors, such as disk exhaustion and node crash. Before TiDB v6.5.0, data that is backed up before the interruption would be invalidated even after the error is addressed, and you need to start the backup from scratch. For large clusters, this incurs considerable extra cost. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo and improve clarity in the interruption description.
The phrase “due t recoverable errors” is a typo and can be made more concise.
-Snapshot backup might be interrupted due t recoverable errors, such as disk exhaustion and node crash.
+Snapshot backups can be interrupted due to recoverable errors, such as disk exhaustion and node crashes.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Snapshot backup might be interrupted due t recoverable errors, such as disk exhaustion and node crash. Before TiDB v6.5.0, data that is backed up before the interruption would be invalidated even after the error is addressed, and you need to start the backup from scratch. For large clusters, this incurs considerable extra cost. | |
| Snapshot backups can be interrupted due to recoverable errors, such as disk exhaustion and node crashes. Before TiDB v6.5.0, data that is backed up before the interruption would be invalidated even after the error is addressed, and you need to start the backup from scratch. For large clusters, this incurs considerable extra cost. |
| Snapshot backup might be interrupted due t recoverable errors, such as disk exhaustion and node crash. Before TiDB v6.5.0, data that is backed up before the interruption would be invalidated even after the error is addressed, and you need to start the backup from scratch. For large clusters, this incurs considerable extra cost. | ||
|
|
||
| In TiDB v6.5.0, Backup & Restore (BR) introduces the checkpoint backup feature to allow continuing an interrupted backup. This feature can retain most data of the interrupted backup. | ||
| In TiDB v6.5.0, Backup & Restore (B) introduces the checkpoint backup feature to allow continuing an interrupted backup. This feature can retain most data of the interrupted backup. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the Backup & Restore abbreviation.
The BR tool is abbreviated as “BR,” not “B.”
-In TiDB v6.5.0, Backup & Restore (B) introduces the checkpoint backup feature to allow continuing an interrupted backup.
+In TiDB v6.5.0, Backup & Restore (BR) introduces the checkpoint backup feature to allow continuing an interrupted backup.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| In TiDB v6.5.0, Backup & Restore (B) introduces the checkpoint backup feature to allow continuing an interrupted backup. This feature can retain most data of the interrupted backup. | |
| In TiDB v6.5.0, Backup & Restore (BR) introduces the checkpoint backup feature to allow continuing an interrupted backup. This feature can retain most data of the interrupted backup. |
| ## Application scenarios | ||
|
|
||
| If your TiDB cluster is large and cannot afford to back up again after a failure, you can use the checkpoint backup feature. The br command-line tool (hereinafter referred to as `br`) periodically records the shards that have been backed up. In this way, the next backup retry can use the backup progress close to the abnormal exit. | ||
| If your TiDB cluster is large and cannot affords to backup again after a failure, you can use the checkpoint backup feature. The br command-line tool (hereinafter referred to as `br`) periodically records the shards that have been backed up. In this way, the next backup retry can use the backup progress close to the abnormal exit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix grammar in the usage scenario sentence.
Use the base forms “afford” and “back up” after “cannot.”
-If your TiDB cluster is large and cannot affords to backup again after a failure, you can use the checkpoint backup feature.
+If your TiDB cluster is large and cannot afford to back up again after a failure, you can use the checkpoint backup feature.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| If your TiDB cluster is large and cannot affords to backup again after a failure, you can use the checkpoint backup feature. The br command-line tool (hereinafter referred to as `br`) periodically records the shards that have been backed up. In this way, the next backup retry can use the backup progress close to the abnormal exit. | |
| If your TiDB cluster is large and cannot afford to back up again after a failure, you can use the checkpoint backup feature. The br command-line tool (hereinafter referred to as `br`) periodically records the shards that have been backed up. In this way, the next backup retry can use the backup progress close to the abnormal exit. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~15-~15: The modal verb ‘cannot’ requires the verb’s base form.
Context: ...f your TiDB cluster is large and cannot affords to backup again after a failure, you ca...
(MD_BASEFORM)
1 participant
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?
Summary by CodeRabbit