Skip to content

93 refactor generic build pipeline #94

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

immxmmi
Copy link
Collaborator

@immxmmi immxmmi commented May 5, 2025

No description provided.

@immxmmi immxmmi requested review from chrira and Copilot May 5, 2025 09:33
@immxmmi immxmmi self-assigned this May 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the generic build pipeline by updating the GitHub Actions workflow.

  • Introduces a manual trigger (workflow_dispatch) for the build.
  • Splits the pipeline into dedicated jobs (lint, build_and_push, deploy, and comment).
  • Updates environment variable usage and Helm-related commands for deployment consistency.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/workflows/build.yaml:14

  • [nitpick] Consider renaming 'TRAINING_VERSION' for consistency with 'HELM_RELEASE' and 'HELM_NAME', for example to 'HELM_VERSION'.
TRAINING_VERSION: ${{ github.sha }}


jobs:
build:
lint:
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI May 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] Consider adding caching for npm dependencies in the 'lint' job to improve workflow performance.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

@chrira chrira merged commit 9dace25 into puzzle:93-refactor-generic-build-pipeline May 6, 2025
6 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants