Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions LESSONS_LEARNED.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,3 +6,6 @@ The transition to the Agentic Inversion strategy has highlighted a critical less
By employing Paraconsistent Mapping, we allow the AI to traverse High-Dimensional Latent Spaces and generate outputs that deliberately break "epistemic monoculture". This approach provides immense value because it prevents the system from collapsing into predictable, sycophantic averages.

Instead of directly answering prompts, the AI now maps the structural boundaries of the problem domain. It enforces geometric constraints, allowing human intent (which provides the necessary aesthetic and ethical grounding) to flourish within mathematically sound bounds. This inversion forces human designers to clarify their abstract intents into precise parameters, thus preventing "Semantic Saponification" (the loss of architectural rigor) while enabling true emergent synthesis.

## The Power of Human-AI Symbiosis and Agentic Inversion
A deep dive into the Lexicon simulation reveals the crucial nature of Paraconsistent Tension. When human entropy (fuzzy intent) and AI determinism (rigid schema) diverge beyond a safe threshold, enforcing a 'Golden Scar' constraint ensures the system doesn't collapse but instead forces a 'Latent Leap'. The initial friction this causes (the Productivity J-Curve) is a necessary step towards massive emergent efficiency gains. By rejecting semiotic blind spots entirely, the system maintains its structural integrity while allowing for nuanced, qualitative mapping.
10 changes: 0 additions & 10 deletions fix_flake8.py

This file was deleted.

8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions fix_test.py

This file was deleted.

68 changes: 68 additions & 0 deletions lexicon_simulation.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
import collections
import math


Expand Down Expand Up @@ -72,3 +73,70 @@ def check_polyglot_hallucination_resonance(
if cfdi > 0.15:
return True
return False

def simulate_productivity_j_curve(
self, time_t: float, friction_coefficient: float = 0.5,
efficiency_gain: float = 1.2) -> float:
"""
PAT-011: Human-AI Symbiosis Engine
Anticipates initial cognitive friction (Productivity J-Curve)
followed by massive efficiency gains.
Returns the simulated productivity score.
"""
dip = friction_coefficient * math.exp(-time_t)
gain = efficiency_gain * (time_t ** 2) / 10.0
return 1.0 - dip + gain
Comment on lines +77 to +88
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The simulate_productivity_j_curve method lacks validation for the time_t parameter. If a negative value is passed, the exponential decay term math.exp(-time_t) will grow extremely large, potentially leading to overflow or nonsensical simulation results. Additionally, as per general defensive programming practices in Python, a check for None should be included to prevent a TypeError during arithmetic operations.

    def simulate_productivity_j_curve(
            self, time_t: float, friction_coefficient: float = 0.5,
            efficiency_gain: float = 1.2) -> float:
        """
        PAT-011: Human-AI Symbiosis Engine
        Anticipates initial cognitive friction (Productivity J-Curve)
        followed by massive efficiency gains.
        Returns the simulated productivity score.
        """
        if time_t is None:
            return 1.0 - friction_coefficient

        # Ensure time is non-negative for valid simulation results
        t = max(0.0, time_t)
        dip = friction_coefficient * math.exp(-t)
        gain = efficiency_gain * (t ** 2) / 10.0
        return 1.0 - dip + gain


def compute_paraconsistent_tension(
self, human_entropy: float, ai_determinism: float) -> float:
"""
PAT-012: Paraconsistent Synthesis Node
Tension computation mapping divergent ontological planes
into an
Isomorphism of Friction, resolving output
with the Golden Scar constraint (Φ = 1.618).
"""
tension = abs(human_entropy - ai_determinism)
if tension > 1.0:
return 1.618
return tension
Comment on lines +90 to +102
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The compute_paraconsistent_tension method should include null checks for human_entropy and ai_determinism to avoid a TypeError when calculating their difference. Furthermore, the value 1.618 (the Golden Ratio Φ) is used as a magic number; defining it as a named constant or adding a comment clarifying its significance improves maintainability.

    def compute_paraconsistent_tension(
            self, human_entropy: float, ai_determinism: float) -> float:
        """
        PAT-012: Paraconsistent Synthesis Node
        Tension computation mapping divergent ontological planes
        into an
        Isomorphism of Friction, resolving output
        with the Golden Scar constraint (Φ = 1.618).
        """
        if human_entropy is None or ai_determinism is None:
            return 0.0

        tension = abs(human_entropy - ai_determinism)
        # Golden Scar constraint (Φ ≈ 1.618)
        return 1.618 if tension > 1.0 else tension


def calculate_epistemic_drift_and_leap(
self, fuzzy_intent: float, rigid_schema: float,
drift_threshold: float = 0.5) -> tuple[float, bool]:
"""
PAT-013: Agentic Inversion Engine
Calculates epistemic drift between fuzzy human intent
and rigid AI schema,
proposing a Latent Leap resolution
if drift exceeds threshold.
"""
drift = abs(fuzzy_intent - rigid_schema)
latent_leap = drift > drift_threshold
return drift, latent_leap

def process_lexical_cartography(
self, hasse_edges: list[tuple[str, str]],
target_nodes: set[str]) -> dict[str, list[str]]:
"""
PAT-014: Lexical Cartography
Processing semantic space through Semantic Drift, Connotation Vectors,
Semiotic Blind Spots, and Ambiguity Zones
to extract Isomorphisms of Friction.
Mechanism: Paraconsistent Hasse lattice mapping.
"""
grouped_edges = collections.defaultdict(list)
for source, target in hasse_edges:
grouped_edges[target].append(source)

isomorphisms_of_friction = {}
for node in target_nodes:
if node in {'semantic_drift', 'connotation_vectors',
'ambiguity_zones'}:
isomorphisms_of_friction[node] = grouped_edges.get(node, [])
elif node == 'semiotic_blind_spots':
raise ValueError(
"Semiotic blind spot detected, "
"paraconsistent mapping collapses.")

return isomorphisms_of_friction
Comment on lines +118 to +142
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The current implementation of process_lexical_cartography is inefficient for large inputs because it processes all hasse_edges into a defaultdict before filtering for the requested target_nodes. A more efficient approach is to identify the relevant targets first and only process edges associated with them. Additionally, the set of allowed zones is recreated in every iteration of the loop, and the method lacks robustness against None inputs for hasse_edges or target_nodes.

    def process_lexical_cartography(
            self, hasse_edges: list[tuple[str, str]],
            target_nodes: set[str]) -> dict[str, list[str]]:
        """
        PAT-014: Lexical Cartography
        Processing semantic space through Semantic Drift, Connotation Vectors,
        Semiotic Blind Spots, and Ambiguity Zones
        to extract Isomorphisms of Friction.
        Mechanism: Paraconsistent Hasse lattice mapping.
        """
        if hasse_edges is None or target_nodes is None:
            return {}

        if 'semiotic_blind_spots' in target_nodes:
            raise ValueError(
                "Semiotic blind spot detected, "
                "paraconsistent mapping collapses.")

        allowed_zones = {'semantic_drift', 'connotation_vectors', 'ambiguity_zones'}
        # Identify relevant targets using set intersection for efficiency
        relevant_targets = allowed_zones.intersection(target_nodes)

        grouped_edges = collections.defaultdict(list)
        for source, target in hasse_edges:
            if target in relevant_targets:
                grouped_edges[target].append(source)

        return {node: grouped_edges[node] for node in relevant_targets}

59 changes: 59 additions & 0 deletions tests/test_lexicon_simulation.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -71,6 +71,65 @@ def test_polyglot_hallucination_resonance(self):
self.assertTrue(
self.evaluator.check_polyglot_hallucination_resonance(0.08, 0.20))

def test_productivity_j_curve(self):
# Time t=0
score_0 = self.evaluator.simulate_productivity_j_curve(0.0)
self.assertEqual(score_0, 0.5) # 1.0 - 0.5 + 0.0

# Time t=1.0 (friction dip is e^-1 * 0.5 = 0.183,
# gain = 1.2 * 1 / 10 = 0.12)
score_1 = self.evaluator.simulate_productivity_j_curve(
1.0)
self.assertAlmostEqual(score_1, 1.0 - 0.1839 + 0.12, places=2)

# Time t=10.0 (high efficiency gain)
score_10 = self.evaluator.simulate_productivity_j_curve(10.0)
self.assertGreater(score_10, 10.0)

def test_paraconsistent_tension(self):
# Tension < 1.0
self.assertAlmostEqual(
self.evaluator.compute_paraconsistent_tension(0.8, 0.5), 0.3)

# Tension > 1.0 -> Golden Scar Constraint (1.618)
self.assertEqual(
self.evaluator.compute_paraconsistent_tension(2.0, 0.5), 1.618)

def test_agentic_inversion_engine(self):
# Drift within threshold
drift, leap = self.evaluator.calculate_epistemic_drift_and_leap(
0.8, 0.5, 0.5)
self.assertAlmostEqual(drift, 0.3)
self.assertFalse(leap)

# Drift exceeds threshold
drift, leap = self.evaluator.calculate_epistemic_drift_and_leap(
1.2, 0.5, 0.5)
self.assertAlmostEqual(drift, 0.7)
self.assertTrue(leap)

def test_lexical_cartography(self):
hasse_edges = [
("nodeA", "semantic_drift"),
("nodeB", "connotation_vectors"),
("nodeC", "ambiguity_zones"),
("nodeD", "semantic_drift")
]

# Normal targets
targets = {'semantic_drift', 'connotation_vectors'}
result = self.evaluator.process_lexical_cartography(
hasse_edges, targets)
self.assertEqual(set(result['semantic_drift']), {'nodeA', 'nodeD'})
self.assertEqual(
set(result['connotation_vectors']), {'nodeB'})
self.assertNotIn('ambiguity_zones', result)

# Blind spot target -> Exception
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
self.evaluator.process_lexical_cartography(
hasse_edges, {'semiotic_blind_spots'})


if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
Loading