Skip to content

Add ReplaceRedundantJoinWithProject rule to optimizer #25169

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xin-zhang2
Copy link
Contributor

@xin-zhang2 xin-zhang2 commented May 21, 2025

Description

Add ReplaceRedundantJoinWithProject rule to the optimizer.
Adapted from trino/PR#7079.

Motivation and Context

Impact

Test Plan

Contributor checklist

  • Please make sure your submission complies with our contributing guide, in particular code style and commit standards.
  • PR description addresses the issue accurately and concisely. If the change is non-trivial, a GitHub Issue is referenced.
  • Documented new properties (with its default value), SQL syntax, functions, or other functionality.
  • If release notes are required, they follow the release notes guidelines.
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable.
  • CI passed.

Release Notes

Please follow release notes guidelines and fill in the release notes below.

== NO RELEASE NOTE ==

Changes adapted from trino/PR#7079
Author: kasiafi

Co-authored-by: kasiafi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: mohsaka <[email protected]>
@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci added the from:IBM PR from IBM label May 21, 2025
@xin-zhang2 xin-zhang2 marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2025 15:05
@xin-zhang2 xin-zhang2 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2025 15:05
@xin-zhang2 xin-zhang2 requested a review from hantangwangd May 21, 2025 15:05
@prestodb-ci prestodb-ci requested review from a team, jp-sivaprasad and auden-woolfson and removed request for a team May 21, 2025 15:05
@auden-woolfson
Copy link
Contributor

test other modules should be fixed on master, rebasing will get it to pass

@hantangwangd
Copy link
Member

@xin-zhang2 Please correct me if I'm wrong, but have we already supported this optimization behavior through SimplifyPlanWithEmptyInput?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
from:IBM PR from IBM
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants