-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
signal: fix sigaction temporary unmasking other signals #428
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @etiaro, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've addressed a critical bug in the signal handling mechanism where the sigaction function was inadvertently unmasking other signals due to an incorrect argument order in the signalMask function calls. This fix ensures that signal masking behaves as expected, preventing unintended signal delivery and improving the robustness of the system's signal management.
Highlights
- Fixing
signal()function's signal mask: I have corrected the argument order for thesignalMaskfunction call within thesignal()function. Previously, thenewmaskandoldmaskparameters were inverted, leading to incorrect signal unmasking. - Fixing
sigaction()function's signal mask: I have also corrected the argument order for thesignalMaskfunction call within thesigaction()function, addressing the same issue of invertednewmaskandoldmaskparameters.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes a critical bug in signal() and sigaction() where changing a signal handler would temporarily unmask all other signals, potentially leading to race conditions. The fix correctly adjusts the call to signalMask to only mask the specific signal being handled, rather than replacing the entire signal mask. My review includes suggestions to improve code portability and clarity by replacing a magic number with a more type-safe equivalent.
Unit Test Results8 201 tests +384 7 677 ✅ +362 41m 25s ⏱️ -22s Results for commit a89e104. ± Comparison against base commit edbda70. This pull request removes 10 and adds 394 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
JIRA: RTOS-1097
a840de2 to
a89e104
Compare
Description
Resolves phoenix-rtos/phoenix-rtos-project#1367
JIRA: RTOS-1097
Motivation and Context
Types of changes
How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist:
Special treatment