Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fixed handling of empty values for predefined fields #696

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

pamburus
Copy link
Owner

@pamburus pamburus commented Jan 21, 2025

Additional fixes related to #694

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.81%. Comparing base (56fcff4) to head (26621a4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on release/0.30.3.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           release/0.30.3     #696      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           80.55%   80.81%   +0.25%     
==================================================
  Files                  41       41              
  Lines               12029    12025       -4     
==================================================
+ Hits                 9690     9718      +28     
+ Misses               2339     2307      -32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pamburus pamburus marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2025 22:12
@pamburus pamburus merged commit abc0ffb into release/0.30.3 Jan 21, 2025
5 checks passed
@pamburus pamburus deleted the feature/empty-values branch January 21, 2025 22:14
pamburus added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
* fix(logfmt): fixed parsing of empty unquoted values (#695)
* fix: fixed handling of empty values for predefined fields (#696)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant