Skip to content

Conversation

nalind
Copy link
Member

@nalind nalind commented Oct 13, 2025

The template for django-psql-example apps doesn't specify a branch, but the default branch no longer contains anything.

Update the test to supply "2.2.x" as the branch name to use in the https://github.com/sclorg/django-ex.git repository.

@nalind nalind force-pushed the django-psql-main-empty branch from ba4bac8 to fd01411 Compare October 13, 2025 20:48
@nalind nalind changed the title test/extended/image_ecosystem.NewSampleRepoTest() fix django-psql test/extended/image_ecosystem.NewSampleRepoTest(): fix django-psql Oct 13, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from rhdmalone and shannon October 13, 2025 20:49
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nalind
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign rhdmalone for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@nalind
Copy link
Member Author

nalind commented Oct 15, 2025

There are other references to this repository in examples and samples that I didn't touch. Should they be updated to refer to the same tag that this one uses, where it does?

The template for django-psql-example apps doesn't specify a branch, but
the default branch no longer contains anything.

Update the test to supply "2.2.x" as the branch name to use in the
https://github.com/sclorg/django-ex.git repository.

Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <[email protected]>
@nalind nalind force-pushed the django-psql-main-empty branch from fd01411 to 77539a8 Compare October 17, 2025 13:50
@nalind
Copy link
Member Author

nalind commented Oct 17, 2025

Rebased. The go-verify-deps is complaining about go.mod mentioning github.com/openshift/api v3.9.0+incompatible, even though go.mod also overrides it with a "replace" directive later on.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2025

@nalind: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2 77539a8 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 77539a8 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi 77539a8 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips 77539a8 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 77539a8 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 77539a8 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn 77539a8 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/go-verify-deps 77539a8 link true /test go-verify-deps
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn 77539a8 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift 77539a8 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial 77539a8 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: 77539a8

Job Name New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 Medium - "[sig-api-machinery] API Streaming (aka. WatchList) [FeatureGate:WatchList] [Beta] [Serial] server supports sending resources in Table format [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 Medium - "[sig-api-machinery] API Streaming (aka. WatchList) [FeatureGate:WatchList] [Beta] [Serial] should NOT be requested by metadata client's List method when WatchListClient is enabled [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 Medium - "[sig-node] Pod Level Resources [Serial] [Feature:PodLevelResources] [FeatureGate:PodLevelResources] [Beta] Guaranteed QoS pod with container resources [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" is a new test, and was only seen in one job.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 High - "[sig-node] Pod Level Resources [Serial] [Feature:PodLevelResources] [FeatureGate:PodLevelResources] [Beta] Guaranteed QoS pod, 1 container with resources [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" is a new test, was only seen in one job, and failed 1 time(s) against the current commit.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 77539a8

  • "[sig-api-machinery] API Streaming (aka. WatchList) [FeatureGate:WatchList] [Beta] [Serial] server supports sending resources in Table format [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "[sig-api-machinery] API Streaming (aka. WatchList) [FeatureGate:WatchList] [Beta] [Serial] should NOT be requested by metadata client's List method when WatchListClient is enabled [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "[sig-node] Pod Level Resources [Serial] [Feature:PodLevelResources] [FeatureGate:PodLevelResources] [Beta] Guaranteed QoS pod with container resources [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" [Total: 1, Pass: 1, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]
  • "[sig-node] Pod Level Resources [Serial] [Feature:PodLevelResources] [FeatureGate:PodLevelResources] [Beta] Guaranteed QoS pod, 1 container with resources [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] [Suite:k8s]" [Total: 1, Pass: 0, Fail: 1, Flake: 0]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant