-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 663
NO-JIRA: add claude /plugin-api-review command
#15658
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@logonoff: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: logonoff The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@logonoff: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/verified bypass |
|
@logonoff: The In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/meow |
|
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |

example output from #15655
Plugin API Review Report
API change: Internal refactoring to always use canonical model references
JIRA issue: CONSOLE-4837
Current OpenShift version: 4.21
Changes to changelog made? N/A - No plugin API changes
Summary
The changes in this branch are internal console refactoring and do not affect the plugin API. The modified files are:
referenceForModel()instead of conditionally usingpluralorreferenceForModelbased on CRD statususePluralhook (hook version ofconnectToPlural) for internal console useThese files are not part of the
@openshift-console/dynamic-plugin-sdkpackage and are not exported as shared modules or extension APIs. They are internal console implementation files in thefrontend/publicdirectory.Findings
Issues found during review
Code Quality Observations (not plugin API compliance issues):
usePluralfunction callsbuildK8sKind()with the result ofmodelMetadata.find()which can returnundefined. This may cause runtime errors if no matching metadata is found.buildK8sKindwheremetadata.properties?.labelPlural.toLowerCase()doesn't use optional chaining on the.toLowerCase()call.These are internal implementation issues and do not affect plugin API compliance.
Actions taken
None required - no plugin API changes to document.
Compliance score: 10/10
Reason for score: