Skip to content

CORENET-6092: Layer2 (Cluster) UDN API update #2742

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

CORENET-6092: Layer2 (Cluster) UDN API update #2742

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kyrtapz
Copy link
Contributor

@kyrtapz kyrtapz commented Jul 15, 2025

Depends on #2734

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 15, 2025 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@kyrtapz: This pull request references CORENET-6092 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Depends on #2734

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jcaamano and tssurya July 15, 2025 11:40
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kyrtapz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 15, 2025
@kyrtapz kyrtapz mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2025
Merged
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 18, 2025
@kyrtapz
Layer2 (Cluster) UDN API update
45dd3ba 
Add the new API fields to both CUDN and UDN CRDs behind the
PreconfiguredUDNAddresses featuregate.t

Signed-off-by: Patryk Diak <[email protected]>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 29, 2025
@kyrtapz
Copy link
Contributor Author

kyrtapz commented Jul 29, 2025

/hold
Wait for any API changes that might happen in ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#5350

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 29, 2025
@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@kyrtapz: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview 6fa9546 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 45dd3ba link false /test 4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/security 45dd3ba link false /test security
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw 45dd3ba link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw
ci/prow/4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 45dd3ba link false /test 4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial 45dd3ba link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 45dd3ba link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 45dd3ba link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 45dd3ba link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-hypershift-ovn-kubevirt 45dd3ba link false /test e2e-aws-hypershift-ovn-kubevirt
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-ipsec 45dd3ba link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-ipsec
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-ipsec 45dd3ba link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-ipsec
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 45dd3ba link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-images 45dd3ba link true /test 4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jcaamano jcaamano Awaiting requested review from jcaamano

@tssurya tssurya Awaiting requested review from tssurya

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kyrtapz @openshift-ci-robot @openshift-merge-robot