Skip to content

Conversation

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor

@jmguzik jmguzik commented Oct 2, 2025

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Guzik <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 2, 2025
@jmguzik jmguzik closed this Oct 2, 2025
@jmguzik jmguzik reopened this Oct 2, 2025
@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 2, 2025

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/codegen ci/prow/checkconfig

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 2, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/checkconfig, ci/prow/codegen, ci/prow/format, ci/prow/frontend-checks, ci/prow/images, ci/prow/integration, ci/prow/lint, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/unit, ci/prow/validate-vendor

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/codegen ci/prow/checkconfig

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 2, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Pipeline controller response to pipeline required

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 2, 2025

/test bla

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 2, 2025

@jmguzik: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test checkconfig
/test codegen
/test e2e
/test format
/test frontend-checks
/test images
/test integration
/test integration-optional-test
/test lint
/test unit
/test validate-vendor

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

/test breaking-changes
/test e2e-oo
/test security

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-breaking-changes
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-checkconfig
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-codegen
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-format
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-frontend-checks
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-images
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-integration
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-lint
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-security
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-unit
pull-ci-openshift-ci-tools-main-validate-vendor

In response to this:

/test bla

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik jmguzik closed this Oct 3, 2025
@jmguzik jmguzik reopened this Oct 3, 2025
@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/checkconfig

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/checkconfig, ci/prow/format, ci/prow/frontend-checks, ci/prow/images, ci/prow/integration, ci/prow/lint, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/unit, ci/prow/validate-vendor

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/checkconfig

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/override ci/prow/codegen

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/codegen

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/codegen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/override ci/prow/breaking-changes

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/breaking-changes

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/breaking-changes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/override ci/prow/e2e

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/e2e

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/pipeline required

1 similar comment
@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Pipeline controller response to pipeline required

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Pipeline controller response to pipeline required

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/test e2e

@jmguzik jmguzik closed this Oct 3, 2025
@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/codegen ci/prow/checkconfig

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/checkconfig, ci/prow/codegen, ci/prow/format, ci/prow/frontend-checks, ci/prow/images, ci/prow/integration, ci/prow/lint, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/unit, ci/prow/validate-vendor

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/codegen ci/prow/checkconfig

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/test e2e

@jmguzik jmguzik closed this Oct 3, 2025
@jmguzik jmguzik reopened this Oct 3, 2025
@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/checkconfig

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/checkconfig, ci/prow/format, ci/prow/frontend-checks, ci/prow/images, ci/prow/integration, ci/prow/lint, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/unit, ci/prow/validate-vendor

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/checkconfig

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik jmguzik closed this Oct 3, 2025
@jmguzik jmguzik reopened this Oct 3, 2025
@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/checkconfig

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 3, 2025

@jmguzik: Overrode contexts on behalf of jmguzik: ci/prow/checkconfig, ci/prow/format, ci/prow/frontend-checks, ci/prow/images, ci/prow/integration, ci/prow/lint, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/unit, ci/prow/validate-vendor

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/validate-vendor ci/prow/unit ci/prow/security ci/prow/lint ci/prow/integration ci/prow/images ci/prow/frontend-checks ci/prow/format ci/prow/checkconfig

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 3, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 8, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This repository is not currently configured for pipeline controller support.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 8, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This repository is not currently configured for pipeline controller support.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 8, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This repository is not currently configured for pipeline controller support.

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Oct 8, 2025

/pipeline required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 8, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jmguzik, openshift-merge-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2025

@jmguzik: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/breaking-changes 212bc41 link false /test breaking-changes
ci/prow/e2e 212bc41 link true /test e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants