Correcting MockWebServer migration for OkHttp

[steve-aom-elliott]

What's changed?

• New artifactId corrected from mockwebserver3-junit5 to mockwebserver3
• In-progress work for changing how some classes are built / manipulated. Previously there were many methods existing on MockResponse. Now everything has to be switched to using MockResponse.Builder to change all these values.

What's your motivation?

Compilation failures after previous setup's migration ran.

Anything in particular you'd like reviewers to focus on?

• Trying to see if I can cut down on additional recipe calls given there are a fair number of methods yet to migrate.

Checklist

• I've added unit tests to cover both positive and negative cases
• I've read and applied the recipe conventions and best practices
• I've used the IntelliJ IDEA auto-formatter on affected files

[github-actions]

Suggested change

	package org.openrewrite.java.testing.junit5;
	/*
	* Copyright 2025 the original author or authors.
	* <p>
	* Licensed under the Moderne Source Available License (the "License");
	* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
	* You may obtain a copy of the License at
	* <p>
	* https://docs.moderne.io/licensing/moderne-source-available-license
	* <p>
	* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
	* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
	* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
	* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
	* limitations under the License.
	*/
	package org.openrewrite.java.testing.junit5;

[github-actions]

Suggested change

	import org.openrewrite.java.tree.J;
	import org.openrewrite.java.tree.JavaType;
	import org.openrewrite.java.tree.Statement;
	import org.openrewrite.java.tree.TypeUtils;
	import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;
	import org.openrewrite.java.tree.J;

[github-actions]

Suggested change

	j = new JavaIsoVisitor<ExecutionContext>() {
	return new JavaIsoVisitor<ExecutionContext>() {

[github-actions]

Suggested change

	}.visit(j, ctx);
	return j;
	}.visit(j, ctx);

[github-actions]

Suggested change

	// TODO: methods receiving MockResponse - maybe add comment instructing to double check?
	@DocumentExample
	@Test
	void shouldUpgradeMavenDependency() {
	rewriteRun(
	mavenProject("project",
	srcTestJava(
	//language=java
	java(
	"""
	import okhttp3.mockwebserver.MockResponse;
	import okhttp3.mockwebserver.MockWebServer;
	import okhttp3.mockwebserver.RecordedRequest;
	class Test {
	void test() {
	MockWebServer server = new MockWebServer();
	server.enqueue(
	new MockResponse().setHeader("Content-Type", "application/json")
	// new MockResponse()
	// .setHeader("Content-Type", "application/json")
	// .setResponseCode(200)
	// .setBody("{}")
	);
	// RecordedRequest recordedRequest = server.takeRequest();
	}
	}
	""",
	"""
	import mockwebserver3.MockResponse;
	import mockwebserver3.MockWebServer;
	import mockwebserver3.RecordedRequest;
	class Test {
	void test() {
	MockWebServer server = new MockWebServer();
	server.enqueue(
	new MockResponse()
	// .setHeader("Content-Type", "application/json")
	// .setResponseCode(200)
	// .setBody("{}")
	);
	// RecordedRequest recordedRequest = server.takeRequest();
	}
	}
	"""
	)
	),
	//language=xml
	pomXml(
	"""
	<project>
	<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
	<groupId>com.example</groupId>
	<artifactId>demo</artifactId>
	<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
	<dependencies>
	<dependency>
	<groupId>com.squareup.okhttp3</groupId>
	<artifactId>mockwebserver</artifactId>
	<version>4.10.0</version>
	<scope>test</scope>
	</dependency>
	</dependencies>
	</project>
	""",
	spec -> spec.after(pom ->
	assertThat(pom)
	.doesNotContain("<artifactId>mockwebserver</artifactId>")
	.contains("<artifactId>mockwebserver3</artifactId>")
	.containsPattern("<version>5\\.(.*)</version>")
	.actual()
	)
	)
	)
	);
	}
	// TODO: methods receiving MockResponse - maybe add comment instructing to double check?