Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8330106: C2: VectorInsertNode::make() shouldn't call ConINode::make() directly #3433

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

satyenme
Copy link

@satyenme satyenme commented Apr 3, 2025

Backporting JDK-8330106: C2: VectorInsertNode::make() shouldn't call ConINode::make() directly. Adjusts code to call PhaseValues::intcon(), which is required so the node is properly entered in the GVN's hash table and its type is properly recorded in the GVN's type table. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, and local Tier 1, and Tier 2 tests. Patch is clean.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8330106 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8330106: C2: VectorInsertNode::make() shouldn't call ConINode::make() directly (Bug - P4 - Requested)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3433/head:pull/3433
$ git checkout pull/3433

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3433
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3433/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3433

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3433

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3433.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 3, 2025

👋 Welcome back ssubramaniam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport bde3fc0c03c87d1f2605ae6bb84c33fadb7aa865 8330106: C2: VectorInsertNode::make() shouldn't call ConINode::make() directly Apr 3, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2025

⚠️ @satyenme This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 3, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Webrevs

@satyenme
Copy link
Author

satyenme commented Apr 3, 2025

/approval request for backport. Adjusts code to call PhaseValues::intcon(), which is required so the node is properly entered in the GVN's hash table and its type is properly recorded in the GVN's type table

Risk: Medium. Change to compiler code which can have broader impact. Change was merged in April 2024 and present in 23, which mitigates risk.

Testing:

  • GHA Sanity Checks
  • Tier 1 and 2 tests locally

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2025

@satyenme
8330106: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Apr 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval backport clean rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant