-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8374215: [macos] Clean "lic_template.plist" #28959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@alexeysemenyukoracle Please review. |
|
👋 Welcome back almatvee! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated. |
|
@sashamatveev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
| <key>Attributes</key> | ||
| <string>0x0000</string> | ||
| <key>Data</key> | ||
| <data>AAYFTm9yc2sERW5pZwlJa2tlIGVuaWcIU2tyaXYgdXQKQXJraXZlci4uLqNIdmlzIERlIGVyIGVuaWcgaSBiZXN0ZW1tZWxzZW5lIGkgZGVubmUgbGlzZW5zYXZ0YWxlbiwga2xpa2tlciBEZSBwjCAiRW5pZyIta25hcHBlbiBmb3IgjCBpbnN0YWxsZXJlIHByb2dyYW12YXJlbi4gSHZpcyBEZSBpa2tlIGVyIGVuaWcsIGtsaWtrZXIgRGUgcIwgIklra2UgZW5pZyIu</data> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose this is a base64-encoded Norwegian translation of something. We don't support Norwegian l10n.
Supported l10n-s should be in .properties files and encoded as base64 at runtime.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will drop all translations except de, ja, zh_CN and move them to .properties files.
Right, but Should we spend time cleaning the "lic_template.plist" file and adding complexity by moving resources to l10n files, or merely remove support for a license file in DMG packaging? I'm on the fence. |
I think we should not remove it as long as it is supported by I will prefer drop translations, but do not move them to l10n files. |
Right, but this way they will be out of the scope for the localization team. This is not right. Let's get it fixed properly and never touch it again until the The string(s) for this file should be in a separate set of l10n files, don't add them to the |
|
Do you have suggestion if we should issue warning for |
|
I don't support complicating jpackage with the warning. When
We don't need anything extra. |
<key>plst</key>. It is not clear why we need it.<key>plst</key>is not part of it. Other entries seems to be required.Progress
Issue
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28959/head:pull/28959$ git checkout pull/28959Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28959$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28959/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28959View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28959Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28959.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment